Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Optimal Hemodynamics and Risk of Severe Outcomes Post-Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Andrew N Rosenbaum1,2, Bradley W Ternus3, John M Stulak4
1From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Insights
Optimizing pre-implant hemodynamics, including right ventricular stroke work index, right atrial pressure, and blood urea nitrogen, significantly improves outcomes for continuous flow left ventricular assist device patients. Achieving full optimization reduces adverse events and enhances survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Mechanical Circulatory Support
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Limited data exists on pre-implant hemodynamic optimization for continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) patients regarding patient-centered outcomes.
- Hemodynamic status before CF-LVAD implantation is critical for post-operative success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify pre-implant hemodynamic predictors of adverse outcomes in CF-LVAD patients.
- To establish optimal hemodynamic parameters for improved patient-centered outcomes after CF-LVAD implantation.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CF-LVAD implantation between 2007 and 2017.
- Logistic regression modeling to identify predictors of a composite endpoint including need for right ventricular assist device, hemodialysis at 90 days, and 30-day mortality.
- Evaluation of hemodynamic variables (right ventricular stroke work index, right atrial pressure) and laboratory studies (blood urea nitrogen) immediately pre-LVAD.
Main Results:
- Right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), right atrial pressure (RAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were significant predictors of the composite endpoint (p < 0.01).
- Optimal dichotomization points were identified as RVSWI ≤ 500 mmHg*ml*m-2, RAP ≤ 12 mmHg, and BUN ≤ 40 mg/dL.
- A model incorporating these three parameters showed an AUC of 0.77 for predicting the composite endpoint. Patients with fewer optimized parameters had significantly higher odds of adverse outcomes and lower 1-year survival.
Conclusions:
- Low RVSWI, high RAP, and high BUN are independently associated with adverse outcomes and mortality after CF-LVAD implantation.
- Pre-implant optimization of these hemodynamic parameters is crucial for improving patient-centered outcomes.
- A stepwise association exists between the number of optimized parameters and the severity of post-implant adverse events, highlighting the importance of comprehensive hemodynamic management.
Abstract:
Data on pre-implant hemodynamic optimization before continuous flow left ventricular assist device placement (CF-LVAD) with respect to patient-centered outcomes remain limited. Consecutive patients undergoing CF-LVAD implant between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Hemodynamic variables, trends, and laboratory studies were evaluated pre-LVAD implant in a logistic regression model to identify predictors of the primary composite endpoint: the need for right ventricular assist device therapy, the requirement for hemodialysis at 90 days, and 30-day mortality. Multivariate modeling identified three variables significantly associated with the primary endpoint: right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI), right atrial pressure (RAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN); all immediately pre-LVAD, p < 0.01. Optimal dichotomization points were 500 mmHg*ml*m-2, 12 mmHg, and 40 mg/dL. The three-component model identified an AUC of 0.77 (p < 0.0001) for the composite endpoint. Optimization of 2/3 parameters, 1/3, and 0/3 was associated with odds ratios of 3.5 (95% CI, 1.1-11.7), 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1-24.2), and 20.6 (95% CI, 5.3-80.6), respectively, relative to those patients who were fully optimized (3/3 parameters). The number of optimized parameters was also associated with 1-year overall survival (p = 0.02). Low RVSWI, high RAP, and high BUN were independently associated with adverse outcomes after the CF-LVAD implant, demonstrating a stepwise association with severe postimplant adverse events.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy