Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

06:15
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
13.0K
Evidence for Revising the Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening Tool: a Scoping Review.
Lee SmithBattle1, Deborah G Loman1, Jee Hye Yoo1
1Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, 3525 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO 63104 USA.
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma
|February 28, 2022
Summary
Expanding adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) screening is crucial. New categories like community violence and discrimination improve assessment of childhood trauma for timely intervention.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Psychology
- Sociology
Background:
- Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are linked to negative health outcomes, including chronic illness and premature mortality.
- Current primary care screening for ACEs is limited, partly due to the narrow scope of original tools focusing on family dysfunction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current research on expanding ACE categories beyond family dysfunction.
- To identify revisions in the formatting and scoring of ACE screening tools.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across CINAHL, OVID Medline, and PsycINFO databases.
- The review focused on studies that expanded ACE categories or revised the ACE tool's format/scoring.
- Data from 19 studies (published in 18 articles) were independently extracted and verified by at least two authors.
Main Results:
- Most studies expanded ACEs to include community and systemic adversities.
- The most frequently added categories were exposure to community violence (15 studies) and economic hardship in childhood (13 studies).
- Other significant additions included bullying, parental absence/death, and discrimination; three studies revised tool formatting or scoring.
Conclusions:
- Evidence supports broadening ACE screening to encompass a wider range of childhood adversities.
- Expanded ACE assessments can lead to more comprehensive identification of childhood trauma.
- This facilitates timely and appropriate treatment interventions for affected individuals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
170
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
170
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
753
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
753

