Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Outcomes in Blunt vs Penetrating Pelvic Vascular Injuries
Teresa Evans1, Keren Guiab1, Andrew Roberts1
1John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
Blunt pelvic vascular injuries lead to more complications and higher mortality compared to penetrating injuries. Survivors of blunt trauma face a greater likelihood of adverse discharge outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Pelvic vascular injuries are severe trauma with significant morbidity and mortality.
- Differentiating outcomes between blunt and penetrating mechanisms is crucial for targeted treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare patient outcomes between blunt and penetrating vascular injuries of the pelvis.
- To identify specific risk factors associated with each injury type.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2011-2015).
- Inclusion of adult patients (>18 years) with pelvic arterial or venous injuries.
- Exclusion of patients with severe head or chest trauma (AIS score >3).
Main Results:
- Blunt trauma patients were older, more likely to be female, and had higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS).
- Blunt injuries were associated with increased complications (OR: 1.950), adverse discharge (OR: 2.05), and higher mortality (OR: 4.08).
- Penetrating trauma showed a trend towards increased complications and mortality on bivariate analysis.
Conclusions:
- Blunt pelvic vascular injuries are associated with significantly worse outcomes, including more complications and higher mortality.
- Patients with blunt injuries face a greater risk of adverse discharge following survival.
- The findings underscore the need for specific management strategies for blunt pelvic vascular trauma.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in outcomes for patients with blunt and penetrating vascular injuries of the pelvis.
Methods:
Data were abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2015. Patients >18 years with hypogastric, iliac, uterine, or ovarian arterial or venous injuries were included. Individuals with an AIS head or chest score >3 were excluded.
Results:
Of the 2559 patients included, the mean age was 43 years (±19), 75.25% were male, and 32.6% had a comorbidity. 64.9% presented with blunt injury (mean ISS of 23 (±12)). 74.9% experienced a complication. The median hospital length of stay (LOS) and ICU LOS were 10 days and 4 days, respectively. 6.7% had an adverse discharge. Mortality occurred in 8.3%. On bivariate analysis, patients who sustained blunt trauma were older (51 vs 31 years), female (32.7% vs 10.1%), had a higher ISS (25.71 vs 17.65), and had a longer hospital LOS (16.65 vs 13.88). Patients with penetrating trauma had an increased chance of complications (78.4% vs 73.0%) and mortality (10.7% vs 7.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed in patients with blunt injuries have more complications (OR: 1.950 CI: 0.886-4.291 P = .097), a lower ISS (OR: 0.919, CI: 0.908-0.930, P < .001, were more likely to have an adverse discharge (OR: 2.05, CI: 1.62-2.60, P = .000), and had a higher risk of mortality (OR: 4.08 CI: 2.78-6.41 P < .000).
Conclusion:
Patients with blunt pelvic vessel injuries are at risk for an increased number of complications and have a higher risk of mortality. Those who survive are more likely to have an adverse discharge.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Abdominal Aorta
The celiac trunk, a singular artery, divides into the left gastric artery, which...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
Vascular Spasm
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

