Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Authoring systems and assumptions about them.

C Locatis, V Carr

    The Journal of Biocommunication
    |January 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Evaluating authoring systems requires assessing needs and understanding user assumptions. Despite rapid technological change, robust evaluation methods remain crucial for effective system selection and development.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A (Sub)field Guide to Quality Control in Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation on Highresolution T<sub>2</sub>-weighted MRI.

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
    Same author

    Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group.

    Molecular psychiatry·2017
    Same author

    The Illness Management and Recovery Program: an international effectiveness study.

    Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
    Same author

    Duration of untreated psychosis: the relative contribution of individual vs. community factors.

    Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
    Same author

    The SHADE Project: self-help for alcohol/other drug use and depression.

    Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
    Same author

    The SHADE project: self-help for alcohol/other drug use and depression.

    Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
    Same journal

    Kidney anatomy: A Survey of Historical Illustrations and Methods of Depiction.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    Animating Metoidioplasty Anatomy for Urology Nursing Practice.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    Publisher's Comment: JBC Volume 49, Number 2, 2025.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2026
    Same journal

    2025 AMI Professional Salon Award Recipients.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    Same journal

    Publisher's Comment: JBC Volume 49, Number 1, 2025.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    Same journal

    2025 BioImages Salon Award Winners.

    The Journal of biocommunication·2025
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Technology
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Instructional Design

    Background:

    • Growing interest in authoring systems driven by microcomputer adoption among less sophisticated users.
    • Increasing need for effective methods to evaluate these systems and their underlying assumptions.
    • Rapid evolution of the authoring system marketplace and underlying technology.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate authoring systems.
    • To highlight the importance of evaluation methods in the context of evolving technology.
    • To address the assumptions influencing the development and use of authoring systems.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review to establish familiarity with existing systems.
    • Demonstrations and hands-on experience for practical assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of specific criteria and analysis of underlying assumptions for system selection.

    • Main Results:

    • Authoring system vendors are increasingly specializing their marketing efforts.
    • Current systems primarily use traditional frame-based instruction, with intelligent aids emerging.
    • Evaluation methods and measurement problems are more stable than the technology itself.

    Conclusions:

    • System selection should involve assessing local needs and user familiarity.
    • Despite rapid technological advancements, established evaluation principles remain relevant.
    • Intelligent authoring aids are anticipated, but current evaluation frameworks are likely to endure.