Related Experiment Videos
Insulin oscillations per se do not affect glucose turnover parameters in normal man
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
|August 1, 1986
Summary
Continuous and pulsatile intravenous insulin infusions have similar metabolic effects in normal men. Both methods equally regulate glucose turnover, inhibiting endogenous glucose production and stimulating glucose uptake.
Area of Science:
- Metabolic studies
- Endocrinology
- Glucose metabolism
Background:
- Insulin delivery methods, continuous vs. pulsatile, have different physiological profiles.
- Understanding their metabolic impact is crucial for diabetes management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the metabolic effects of continuous versus pulsatile intravenous insulin infusion.
- To assess glucose turnover and hormonal responses in normal men.
Main Methods:
- Normal men received glucose-controlled intravenous glucose infusions with inhibited endogenous hormone secretion and replaced glucagon.
- Insulin was administered either continuously or pulsatilely over 260 minutes.
- Glucose turnover was measured using [3H]glucose infusion, with continuous monitoring of blood glucose and glucose infusion rates (GIR).
Main Results:
- Both infusion methods led to suppressed C-peptide and elevated glucagon levels.
- Plasma insulin levels differed, but glucose appearance rate and endogenous glucose production (EGP) initially increased in both tests.
- Over time, EGP declined, and glucose uptake increased, with no significant differences in GIR or other parameters between continuous and pulsatile insulin delivery.
Conclusions:
- Continuous and pulsatile intravenous insulin infusions demonstrate equivalent metabolic effects on glucose turnover in healthy individuals.
- Both methods effectively inhibit glucagon-stimulated EGP and promote peripheral glucose uptake.
- Physiological peripheral plasma insulin levels achieved by either method similarly impact glucose metabolism.