Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
Published on: October 13, 2017
The Circle of Security Parenting Program (COS-P): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Low Intensity, Individualized
Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck1, Julia Rudolph2, Elia-Jade Edwards2
1Griffith University, School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland.
Insights
The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P) showed small effects on reducing caregiver attachment anxiety and negative parenting. Further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness for at-risk families.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Attachment Theory
- Intervention Studies
Background:
- The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P) is a widely disseminated psychoeducational program for caregivers.
- It is grounded in attachment theory, aiming to enhance caregiver-child relationships and child well-being through computer-delivered content and parent reflection.
- This study addresses the need for evidence on COS-P's effectiveness with at-risk families experiencing parenting distress and child disruptive behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the individually delivered Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P) compared to a waitlist control.
- To assess the impact of COS-P on various caregiver and child outcomes, including attachment, parenting stress, and child symptoms.
- To provide evidence regarding the efficacy of COS-P for improving outcomes in at-risk families.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 85 Australian caregivers reporting parenting distress and child disruptive behaviors.
- Participants were assigned to either the COS-P intervention group (n=51) or a waitlist control group (n=34).
- Assessments of child symptoms, parenting stress, attachment anxiety/avoidance, reflective functioning, parenting practices, and depressive symptoms were conducted at baseline and post-intervention/waitlist period.
Main Results:
- While no baseline differences were observed, analyses of complete data indicated a greater reduction in caregiver attachment anxiety and negative parenting in the COS-P group compared to the waitlist control.
- Intent-to-treat analyses revealed significant reductions in attachment anxiety for the COS-P group.
- Other observed improvements were not significantly different between the COS-P and waitlist conditions, with overall effects being small and infrequently significant.
Conclusions:
- The individually delivered Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P) demonstrated limited and rarely significant effects on improving outcomes for at-risk caregivers and their children.
- While some reductions in attachment anxiety and negative parenting were noted, the small effect sizes suggest caution in its application.
- The findings highlight the need to explore and consider alternative intervention programs with stronger evidence of effectiveness for supporting at-risk families.
Abstract:
The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P; Cooper et al., 2009) is a psychoeducational program for caregivers of young children that has been widely disseminated. The program is founded in attachment theory and relies on computer-delivered content and parent reflection and discussion to teach concepts of safety and security to promote better caregiver-child relationships and child wellbeing. The present study is a randomized controlled trial of COS-P, individually delivered to 85 Australian caregivers (51 COS-P, 34 waitlist control) who reported parenting distress and child disruptive behaviors. Caregivers completed a baseline assessment and repeated the assessment after completion of COS-P or 8 weeks on the waitlist. Caregivers completed surveys to report child symptoms, and parenting stress, anxious and avoidant attachment, reflective functioning, parenting practices, and depressive symptoms. No differences in COS-P vs. waitlist participants were found at baseline. Analyses of complete data (35 COS-P, 25-26 waitlist) revealed a greater decline in caregivers' attachment anxiety and negative parenting relative to waitlist, but only attachment anxiety in intent-to-treat analyses. Other improvements were found, but these extended to both the COS-P and waitlist conditions and did not differ between conditions. Overall, effects of COS-P were small and rarely significant, suggesting the need to consider alternative programs that have evidence of effectiveness when providing services to at-risk families.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Attachment
Attachment Styles
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Parental Care

