Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pneumatic nasal catheters: advantages and drawbacks.

S Elwany, T Kamel, A Mekhamer

    The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Pneumatic nasal catheters offer effective epistaxis (nosebleed) control without hypoxia or cardiopulmonary strain. While generally safe and easy to use, careful technique minimizes the risk of nasal tissue damage.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ten-year experience with multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of odontogenic sinusitis.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2021
    Same author

    Cluster of differentiation 8 T-cell population in the laryngeal mucosa of smokers with laryngeal cancer.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2019
    Same author

    Flexible bronchoscopy-related safety in patients with severe ARDS.

    Critical care (London, England)·2018
    Same author

    The significance of atherosclerosis in hypertensive patients with epistaxis.

    The Journal of laryngology and otology·2018
    Same author

    Prognostic significance of central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference during the first 24 hours of septic shock in patients with and without impaired cardiac function.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2017
    Same author

    Change in end-tidal carbon dioxide outperforms other surrogates for change in cardiac output during fluid challenge.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2017

    Area of Science:

    • Otolaryngology
    • Medical Devices

    Background:

    • Epistaxis, or nosebleeds, is a common condition requiring effective management.
    • Traditional methods like gauze packing can lead to complications such as hypoxia and discomfort.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pneumatic nasal catheters for epistaxis treatment.
    • To compare pneumatic catheter use with traditional gauze packing methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective review of patients treated with pneumatic nasal catheters for epistaxis.
    • Assessment of catheter effectiveness, ease of use, and adverse events.
    • Comparison of outcomes with historical data of gauze packing.

    Main Results:

    • Pneumatic catheters provided effective hemostasis in epistaxis cases.
    • This method avoided hypoxia, hypercapnia, and cardiopulmonary stress associated with other techniques.
    • Reduced need for sedation and simpler application/removal were noted.
    • Pressure necrosis of nasal mucosa and septum is a potential adverse effect, manageable with technical precautions.

    Conclusions:

    • Pneumatic nasal catheters are a viable and advantageous alternative for epistaxis management.
    • Careful application technique is crucial to mitigate risks like pressure necrosis.

    Related Experiment Videos