Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
Ayman Al-Atta1, Mohammad Zaidan2, Ahmed Abdalwahab1,3
1Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, NE7 7DN Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Insights
Patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (CS) face poor outcomes. This review explores updated CS classification, pathophysiology, and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) evidence to improve patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a high mortality rate.
- Recent decades show some improvement in CS mortality, but significant challenges remain.
- Standard care involves shock protocols, including volume expansion, inotropes/vasopressors, and early revascularization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss emerging concepts in cardiogenic shock, including updated classification and pathophysiology.
- To review recent evidence on the use and optimal timing of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in CS patients.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on recent advancements in cardiogenic shock management.
- Analysis of data regarding the efficacy and outcomes associated with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices.
- Examination of studies on the timing of MCS initiation in patients with CS.
Main Results:
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices show improved hemodynamic and metabolic profiles in CS patients.
- Despite hemodynamic benefits, MCS has not consistently reduced adverse cardiovascular events.
- Evidence on the optimal timing for initiating MCS in CS is still evolving.
Conclusions:
- Understanding evolving CS classification and pathophysiology is crucial.
- Further research is needed to translate MCS hemodynamic benefits into reduced adverse cardiovascular events.
- Optimizing the timing of MCS initiation is key to improving outcomes for CS patients.
Abstract:
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) have poor prognosis. Over the last two decades, there has been some improvement in mortality rates associated with CS. Initial measures to stabilise patients should follow a shock protocol, including therapies such as volume expansion, inotropes/vasopressors, and early coronary revascularisation. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices demonstrated better haemodynamic and metabolic profiles for patients with CS. However, these benefits have not been consistently translated into significant reductions in cardiovascular adverse events. This review aims to discuss emerging concepts related to CS including an update on its classification and pathophysiology. The focus is on recent evidence regarding the use of MCS and the timing of initiating in patients with CS.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

