Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

A Modified Lean and Release Technique to Emphasize Response Inhibition and Action Selection in Reactive Balance
Published on: March 19, 2020
Action observation facilitates anticipatory control of grasp for object mass but not weight distribution
Trevor Lee-Miller1, Jennifer Gutterman1, Jaymin Chang1
1Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Box 93, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, United States.
Abstract:
Action observation has been shown to facilitate the performance of the observer and is being increasingly used as a rehabilitation tool following neurological damage. During object manipulation, visual observation of performance is suggested to enable the updating of the sensorimotor representations of object properties. Here, through 3 experiments, we examine the effect of action observation of a novel object on the updating of object mass and weight distribution for bimanual manipulation. For each experiment, naïve participants were allocated into pairs and assigned as the "performer" or "observer". For experiments 1 and 2, observers sat opposite the performers. For experiment 3, observers stood behind the performer. The pairs observed and lifted either i) a light or heavy box in experiment 1, or ii) a box with a left or right uneven center of mass in experiments 2 and 3. Our results showed that action observation facilitated the updating of object mass information but not information about weight distribution. Specifically, observers of the heavy box subsequently applied larger forces and force rates in accord with the mass of the box. In contrast, both performers and observers of the uneven box had large peak rolls. We suggest that this shows the robustness of observation in facilitating an understanding of object mass while highlighting the complexity of manipulating an object with uneven weight distribution.
Related Concept Videos
Rigid Body Equilibrium Problems - II
Consider two children sitting on a seesaw, which has negligible mass. The first child has a mass (m1) of 26 kg and sits at point A, which is 1.6 meters (r1) from the pivot point B; the second child has a mass (m2) of 32 kg and sits at point C. How far from the pivot point B should the second child sit (r2) to balance the seesaw?
Center of Gravity
Conservation of Mass in Fixed, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the case of a sewer pipe, which can be modeled...
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Muscle Coordination and Action
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....

