Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

8.7K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
8.7K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

16.0K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
16.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.2K
Entropy Change in Reversible Processes01:10

Entropy Change in Reversible Processes

2.8K
In the Carnot engine, which achieves the maximum efficiency between two reservoirs of fixed temperatures, the total change in entropy is zero. The observation can be generalized by considering any reversible cyclic process consisting of many Carnot cycles. Thus, it can be stated that the total entropy change of any ideal reversible cycle is zero.
The statement can be further generalized to prove that entropy is a state function. Take a cyclic process between any two points on a p-V diagram.
2.8K
Central Limit Theorem01:14

Central Limit Theorem

16.5K
The central limit theorem, abbreviated as clt, is one of the most powerful and useful ideas in all of statistics. The central limit theorem for sample means says that if you repeatedly draw samples of a given size and calculate their means, and create a histogram of those means, then the resulting histogram will tend to have an approximate normal bell shape. In other words, as sample sizes increase, the distribution of means follows the normal distribution more closely.
The sample size, n, that...
16.5K
Divergence and Stokes' Theorems01:06

Divergence and Stokes' Theorems

2.3K
The divergence and Stokes' theorems are a variation of Green's theorem in a higher dimension. They are also a generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus. The divergence theorem and Stokes' theorem are in a way similar to each other; The divergence theorem relates to the dot product of a vector, while Stokes' theorem relates to the curl of a vector. Many applications in physics and engineering make use of the divergence and Stokes' theorems, enabling us to write...
2.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scale-invariant evolution: Comment on "homo informatio" by Michael Walker.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

The body does not keep the score: trauma, predictive coding, and the restoration of metastability.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026
Same author

The dysconnection hypothesis of schizophrenia: a 30-year update.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026
Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Insula Structure Is Linked to Autonomic Cardiac Dysregulation in Depression.

Biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Correction: Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology-an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Brain Banking: Making the Most of your Research Specimens
08:12

Brain Banking: Making the Most of your Research Specimens

Published on: July 24, 2009

10.1K

Bayesian Brains and the Rényi Divergence.

Noor Sajid1, Francesco Faccio2, Lancelot Da Costa3,4

  • 1Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, U.K. noor.sajid.18@ucl.ac.uk.

Neural Computation
|March 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Rényi divergences as a novel explanation for behavioral variability, proposing an alpha parameter to explain differing preferences and choices in decision-making tasks.

More Related Videos

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Brain Banking: Making the Most of your Research Specimens
08:12

Brain Banking: Making the Most of your Research Specimens

Published on: July 24, 2009

10.1K
Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Psychiatry
  • Decision Theory

Background:

  • Behavioral variability in decision-making is often explained by differing prior beliefs in the Bayesian brain hypothesis.
  • Greedy preferences can arise from confident beliefs about specific outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative framework for understanding behavioral variability using Rényi divergences and variational bounds.
  • To demonstrate how a single parameter (α) can account for diverse behavioral preferences and posterior estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Rényi divergences and their associated variational bounds, analogous to variational free energy.
  • Introduced a continuous parameter α to modulate the variational bounds and influence posterior estimates.
  • Simulated the multiarmed bandit task to exemplify the proposed formulation.

Main Results:

  • Changes in the α parameter systematically alter variational bounds, leading to different posterior estimates and behavioral variations.
  • α→0+ optimization results in mass-covering variational estimates and increased choice variability.
  • α→+∞ optimization leads to mass-seeking variational posteriors and greedy preferences.

Conclusions:

  • Rényi bounds offer a formal mechanism to explain behavioral differences through variations in the α parameter, independent of differing priors.
  • This framework provides a potentially useful explanation for individual differences in behavior for both biological and artificial agents assuming variational Bayesian inference.
  • The α parameterization is particularly relevant when the true posterior distribution differs from the assumed approximate density.