Assessing the relationship between psychosocial risk and pregnancy outcomes using the perinatal integrated
Anne O'Connor1, Antonia W Shand2,3, Francisco J Schneuer3
1Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
The Perinatal Integrated Psychosocial Assessment (PIPA) tool identifies high-risk pregnancies. Early intervention for these women significantly reduced adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal mental health
- Maternal-fetal medicine
- Psychosocial obstetrics
Background:
- The Perinatal Integrated Psychosocial Assessment (PIPA) tool screens for maternal anxiety, depression, and psychosocial risk during pregnancy.
- Identifying psychosocial risk is crucial for improving perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between psychosocial risk identified by the PIPA tool and adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
- To determine if early support for high-risk women mitigates negative outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study included 5969 women giving birth between 2017-2019 at a tertiary maternity hospital.
- Women completed the PIPA tool at their first antenatal visit, categorizing them by risk level.
- Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the association between PIPA risk and outcomes, adjusting for confounders.
Main Results:
- 11.1% of women were categorized as medium-high/high psychosocial risk.
- High-risk women had increased odds of prolonged hospital stay (>72 hours), not breastfeeding at discharge, infant birth complications, and NICU admission.
- A modest increase in cesarean birth odds was observed, with no association with preterm birth or low birthweight.
Conclusions:
- The PIPA tool effectively identifies women at increased risk for adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
- Referral for support significantly attenuated adverse outcomes in high-risk women, highlighting the importance of timely intervention.
Background:
The Perinatal Integrated Psychosocial Assessment (PIPA) tool screens for anxiety, depression, and psychosocial factors in pregnancy. We aimed to assess the association between PIPA-determined psychosocial risk and obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Methods:
Cohort study of all pregnant women who gave birth at ≥20 weeks of gestation in 2017-2019 at a tertiary maternity hospital in, Sydney, Australia. Women completed PIPA at their first antenatal visit and were assigned a PIPA risk category. At-risk women were reviewed and referred for support. The association between PIPA risk category and obstetric and neonatal outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic and pregnancy factors.
Results:
In all, 5969 women completed PIPA; 71.4% were assessed no/low risk, 17.5% medium risk, and 11.1% medium-high/high risk. Compared with no/low-risk women, medium-high/high-risk women were more likely to remain in hospital for >72 hours (aOR 1.47 [95% CI 1.33-1.64]); to not be breastfeeding at discharge (aOR 1.77 [95% CI 1.20-2.61]); to have their infants experience birth complications (aOR 1.24 [95% CI 1.03-1.50]); and to be admitted to the NICU (aOR 1.63 [95% CI 1.26-2.11]). There was a modest increase in odds of cesarean birth (aOR 1.12 [95% CI 1.00-1.27]), and no association with preterm birth or low birthweight. The risk of adverse outcomes disappeared for medium-high/high-risk women referred for support.
Conclusions:
The PIPA tool identified one in 10 women at high psychosocial risk with increased risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Adverse outcomes were attenuated for high-risk women who were referred for extra support, suggesting that psychosocial review and referral for high-risk women may reduce the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Interpersonal Psychotherapy
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Psychodynamic Therapy
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...


