Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

09:04
Guide Wire Assisted Catheterization and Colored Dye Injection for Vascular Mapping of Monochorionic Twin Placentas
Published on: September 5, 2011
15.1K
Is Amniocentesis after CVS Risky?
Kristen Cagino1, Stephen T Chasen1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York.
American Journal of Perinatology
|March 3, 2022
Summary
Women undergoing amniocentesis after chorionic villi sampling (CVS) for placental mosaicism or other issues had similar obstetric outcomes. This reassures patients that a second invasive procedure does not increase adverse pregnancy events.
Area of Science:
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Prenatal Diagnostics
- Reproductive Genetics
Background:
- Approximately 2% of women undergoing chorionic villi sampling (CVS) require a subsequent amniocentesis.
- Reasons for a second procedure include placental mosaicism, sampling errors, or laboratory issues.
- The obstetric outcomes of women undergoing both CVS and amniocentesis are not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare obstetric outcomes in women who underwent both CVS and amniocentesis versus those who underwent CVS alone.
- To assess the safety and impact of a second invasive procedure on pregnancy outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study (2010-2020) of singleton pregnancies.
- Compared 66 women who had CVS followed by amniocentesis with 132 controls who had CVS alone.
- Matched for maternal age and year of pregnancy; excluded early pregnancy loss and terminations.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in pregnancy loss or stillbirth between the two groups.
- Women undergoing both procedures delivered at similar gestational ages and birthweights.
- Amniocentesis was performed for placental mosaicism (44%), sampling/lab issues (33%), or further testing (23%).
Conclusions:
- Women requiring amniocentesis after CVS can be reassured about adverse outcomes.
- The study suggests that a second invasive procedure does not increase risks.
- Larger studies may be needed to detect rare adverse event differences.

