Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Reliability of intra-operative frozen section study in revision of infected hip arthroplasty
Karan Doshi1, Deepesh Daultani2, M Ajith Kumar2
1Tejasvini Hospital & SSIOT, Kadri Temple road, Kadri, Mangalore, Karnataka, 575003, India. karaoshi@gmail.com.
Introduction:
Frozen sections are extensively used to help in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection during revision hip arthroplasty, though there are insufficient data in relation to its usefulness.
Methods:
Twenty-one patients with infected hip arthroplasties were operated in the form of one or two-staged revision hip arthroplasties. A frozen section was obtained intra-operatively and > 5 PMN's/ HPF was considered as a positive indicator of infection. If the frozen section was reported negative (≤5 PMN's/HPF), the revision prosthesis was implanted after a thorough debridement and a wash. If the frozen section was reported as positive, post the debridement; a non-articulating antibiotic-loaded cement spacer was implanted for 8 weeks, supplemented with 3 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and 3 weeks of oral antibiotics. This was followed by an antibiotic-free interval of 2 weeks. The patient was taken up for a revision surgery once the frozen section study was negative (≤5 PMN's/HPF). The patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year to a maximum of 2 years after the revision for any evidence of infection (assessed clinically, serologically, and radiologically).
Results:
Frozen section analysis of PMNs per high power field had a 100% specificity in our patients in detecting periprosthetic joint infection.
Conclusion:
Frozen section study is a safe, rapid, cheap and reliable intra-operative modality to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection.

