Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Differences in the diagnosis and treatment of hematologic malignancies attributable to health insurance coverage
Eun Young Song1, Sue Shin1,2, Hyunwoong Park1,2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Health insurance status impacts the diagnosis and treatment of hematologic malignancies. Medical aid beneficiaries often receive care at secondary hospitals, indicating equitable healthcare access for these patients.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Health Services Research
- Oncology
Background:
- Equitable medical care is a global challenge, even with national health insurance.
- Patient financial capability significantly influences healthcare journeys.
- Disparities in healthcare access and outcomes based on socioeconomic factors are a concern.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate disparities in diagnostic and treatment processes for hematologic malignancies.
- To analyze the influence of patient characteristics, specifically health insurance status, on hematologic malignancy care.
- To assess the quality of care provided by secondary municipal hospitals for patients with hematologic malignancies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 5614 CBC with differential count results from 358 patients (Jan 2010 - Jun 2017).
- Inclusion of 206 patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancy after excluding reactive cases.
- Classification of malignancies into 8 categories: acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), etc.
Main Results:
- Patient age, sex, disease category, and follow-up duration correlated with clinical course.
- Insurance status influenced age, clinical course, and follow-up duration.
- Medical aid beneficiaries were older, more likely to be treated at secondary hospitals, and had longer follow-up durations compared to medical insurance subscribers.
Conclusions:
- Secondary municipal hospitals provide adequate and qualified healthcare services for medical aid beneficiaries with hematologic malignancies.
- Health insurance status is a significant factor influencing the management of hematologic malignancies.
- Further research is needed to address identified healthcare disparities.
Abstract:
Medical care should be equally provided to the public regardless of their financial capability. In the real world, expenditures directly out from the patient sector decide the medical journey, even in a country with national health insurance. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there are differences in the diagnostic and treatment processes in hematologic malignancies based on patient characteristics, such as health insurance status.Through the review of 5614 "CBCs with differential count" results with abnormal cells from 358 patients from January 2010 to June 2017, 238 patients without past medical histories of hematologic malignancies were enrolled. Excluding reactive cases, 206 patients with hematologic malignancy were classified into 8 disease categories: acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), myelodysplastic syndrome/MPN, lymphoid neoplasm, plasma cell neoplasm, r/o hematologic malignancy, and cancer.The patients' age, sex, disease categories and follow-up durations showed associations with the clinical course. The "refusal of treatment" group was the oldest and had a relatively higher percentage of females, whereas those who decided to transfer to a tertiary hospital were younger. The age, clinical course, and follow-up durations were different across health insurance statuses. The medical aid group was the oldest, and the group whose status changed from a medical insurance subscriber to a medical aid beneficiary during treatment was the youngest. The majority of patients who refused treatment or wished to be transferred to a tertiary hospital were medical insurance subscribers. The percentage of patients who were treated in this secondary municipal hospital was higher in the medical-aid beneficiaries group than in the medical insurance group. Follow-up durations were longest in the status change group and shortest in the medical insurance group.Almost all medical aid beneficiaries with hematologic malignancies opted to continue treatment at this secondary/municipal hospitals, indicating that this category of medical institutions provides adequate levels and qualified healthcare services to those patients. The secondary municipal hospital provides qualified healthcare services for medical aid beneficiaries with hematologic malignancies.
More Related Videos
06:33Author Spotlight: Analyzing Bone Marrow Microenvironment in Murine Hematological Malignancies
Published on: November 10, 2023
14:30Immunophenotyping and Cell Sorting of Human MKs from Human Primary Sources or Differentiated In Vitro from Hematopoietic Progenitors
Published on: August 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Standards of Care II
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy...
Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Standards of Care I
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...