Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Operative approach and case volume are associated with negative resection margins for adrenocortical carcinoma
Joshua Tseng1,2, Timothy Diperi1, Nicholas Gonsalves1
1Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 W. 3rd St., Suite 650, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Background:
Surgical resection with negative margins is the treatment of choice for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). This study was undertaken to determine factors associated with negative resection margins.
Methods:
National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2016 to identify patients with AJCC/ENSAT Stage I-III ACC who underwent adrenalectomy. Patient, tumor, facility, and operative characteristics were compared by margin status (positive-PM or negative-NM) and operative approach (open-OA, laparoscopic-LA, or robotic-RA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with PM.
Results:
Eight hundred and eighty-one patients were identified, of which 18.4% had PM and 81.6% had NM. Patients with advanced pathologic T stage and pathologic N1 stage were more likely to have PM (vs. NM) (T3, 49.7% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.01; T4, 26.2% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.01; N1, 6.7% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing OA (vs. LA and RA) were more likely to have advanced clinical T stage (T4, 16.6% vs. 5.7% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.01) and larger tumors (> 6 cm, 84.6% vs. 64.1% vs. 62.3%, p < 0.01). High-volume centers (≥ 5 cases) were more likely to utilize OA. Patients undergoing LA (vs. RA) were more likely to require conversion to open (20.3% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.011). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher odds of PM included T3 disease (OR 7.02, 95% CI 2.66-18.55), T4 disease (OR 10.22, 95% CI 3.66-28.53), and LA (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.28-3.09). High-volume centers were associated with lower odds of PM (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98). There was no significant difference in margin status between OA and RA (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.71-2.90).
Conclusion:
Centers with higher ACC case volumes have lower odds of PM and utilize OA more often. LA is associated with higher odds of PM, whereas RA is not. These factors should be considered when planning the operative approach for ACC.

