Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Experimental Model of Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Mice
Published on: May 17, 2024
A novel approach to assess volumetric bone loss at immediate implant sites and comparison to linear measurements: A
Chi-Ching Chang1, Sung K Kim2, Chun-Teh Lee3
1Department of Periodontics and Dental Hygiene, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry, 7500 Cambridge Street, Suite 6470, Houston, TX 77054, USA; Department of Periodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No.199, Dun-Hua North Rd., Taipei 105406, Taiwan; Chang Gung University, No.259, Wenhua 1st Rd., Taoyuan City 333323, Taiwan.
Objectives:
Studies have evaluated changes in hard tissue following immediate implant placement (IIP) through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. This study compared the 3D volumetric changes of the alveolar bone at immediate implant sites with 2D linear measurement outcomes by using a novel image analysis workflow.
Methods:
Preoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT images of patients who underwent IIP and bone grafting in the maxillary esthetic area were acquired. Linear and volumetric measurements of buccal bone dimensions were taken using a specially designed workflow. The 2D and 3D measurements were compared, and their correlations were determined.
Results:
Images from 13 patients (13 implants) were analyzed. Linear measurements revealed that the general linear buccal bone loss was less than 1mm in all segments. The 3D volumetric bone reduction (reported as median [first quantile, third quantile]) in the vertical, cervical, middle, and apical segments was 14.27 [11.33, 30.66] mm3 (51.30 [42.78, 66.91]%), 16.20 [10.35, 30.52] mm3 (18.20 [9.88, 24.74]%), 17.48 [8.42, 21.17] mm3 (24.05 [12.39, 28.22]%), and 6.87 [3.88, 9.45] mm3 (11.34 [5.14, 22.54]%), respectively. Significant positive correlations between 2D and 3D measurements were consistently identified in the cervical and middle segments, but no significant correlation was noted in the vertical segment.
Conclusions:
The results revealed that linear measurements could not fully represent volumetric bone dimensional changes. Performing volumetric measurements and 3D rendering could be valuable in presenting the actual amount and topography of peri-implant bone remodeling.
Clinical Significance:
Linear measurements only partially represent the real-life event of 3D bone changes at immediate implant sites. Factors affecting hard tissue alterations following IIP should be reassessed using 3D volumetric measurement outcomes.
More Related Videos
11:51An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017