Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

04:30
An Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Ageing on Sentence Processing
Published on: October 25, 2019
5.7K
Interhemispheric transfer time differs between fast and slow healthy adult readers
Hazal Artuvan Korkmaz1, Fikret Ari2, Beyza Doganay Erdogan3
1Department of Physiology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; Brain Research Center, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey; Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence, Ankara, Turkey.
Neuropsychologia
|March 6, 2022
Summary
Slow readers exhibit delayed interhemispheric transfer of visual verbal stimuli, suggesting a deficit in orthographic processing. This difference in callosal transfer speed highlights a key neural distinction in reading abilities.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Reading relies on the visual system and interhemispheric communication via the corpus callosum.
- Callosal function is implicated in reading disorders like dyslexia.
- Investigating callosal transfer speed differences can illuminate neural bases of reading proficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare interhemispheric transfer times for verbal and non-verbal stimuli between slow and fast readers.
- To determine if callosal transfer speed differences correlate with reading speed.
- To identify the neural processing level (e.g., orthographic vs. basic visual) at which reading speed differences arise.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-one university students were categorized as slow (n=15) or fast (n=36) readers.
- Evoked potentials (N1 latencies) measured interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT).
- Verbal (words, pseudowords) and non-verbal (gratings) stimuli were presented to different visual fields.
Main Results:
- Slow readers showed significantly slower right-to-left callosal transfer for verbal stimuli at the parietal site.
- This slower transfer speed in slow readers was linked to visual word decoding processes.
- No significant difference in transfer speed was observed for non-verbal grating stimuli between groups.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that slower interhemispheric transfer of verbal information at the parietal site contributes to slower reading speeds.
- The deficit appears to be at the orthographic-lexical level of visual word processing, not earlier visual stages.
- This research supports the role of callosal function in individual differences in reading ability.

