Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Documenting patients' and providers' preferences when proposing a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative
Devesh Oberoi1, Cynthia Kwok2, Yong Li2
1Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd St. SW, AB, T2S 3C1, Calgary, Canada. devesh.oberoi@albertahealthservices.ca.
Oncology providers and early-stage breast cancer survivors provided feedback on a proposed Telephone Survivorship Clinic (TSC) trial. Their input improved recruitment strategies and assessment tools for better cancer survivorship care transitions.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cancer Survivorship
- Healthcare Delivery
Background:
- Advances in cancer treatment lead to longer survival for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients.
- Best practices recommend transitioning ESBC survivors from oncology care to community-based follow-up.
- There is a need for effective models to manage post-treatment survivorship care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore patient and oncology provider (OP) reactions to proposed methods for a future randomized controlled trial (RCT).
- To test the feasibility of a nurse-led Telephone Survivorship Clinic (TSC) for smooth transitions of ESBC survivors.
- To gather feedback for optimizing recruitment and assessment tools for a survivorship trial.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study design utilizing thematic analysis.
- Two-pronged approach: interviews with OPs and ESBC patients.
- Gathered feedback on recruitment strategies and questionnaire package content and relevance.
Main Results:
- OPs identified facilitators (novelty, utility, simplicity) and barriers (coordination, time, language) to recruitment.
- OPs suggested improvements like combined electronic/paper referrals and clinician support.
- Patient advisors were satisfied with the assessment package but suggested relevance adjustments and additions (trust, proximity).
Conclusions:
- Oncology providers and patient advisors rated proposed trial methods highly for simplicity and relevance.
- Feedback provided actionable insights for refining study design and recruitment processes.
- Findings offer valuable information for effective cancer patient recruitment in survivorship clinical trials.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...