Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
A Unique Multi- and Interdisciplinary Cardiology-Renal-Endocrine Clinic: A Description and Assessment of Outcomes
Lisa Dubrofsky1, Jason F Lee1, Parisa Hajimirzarahimshirazi2
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Insights
A specialized clinic improved care for patients with diabetes, kidney, and cardiovascular disease, showing better cholesterol, A1C, and blood pressure control. This multidisciplinary approach enhances evidence-based treatment and patient-centered outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Patients with diabetes and co-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or cardiovascular disease (CVD) have complex health needs.
- These patients require multiple guideline-directed medical therapies and high healthcare resource utilization.
- The Cardiac and Renal Endocrine Clinic (C.a.R.E. Clinic) offers a unique, multidisciplinary care model to address these challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe patient characteristics and clinical data from the C.a.R.E. Clinic (2014-2020).
- To evaluate the feasibility, strengths, and challenges of this outpatient multidisciplinary care model.
- To assess the impact of the C.a.R.E. Clinic on clinical outcomes and medication use.
Main Methods:
- Single-center retrospective cohort study involving 118 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and co-existing renal and/or cardiovascular disease.
- Manual chart review of demographic, medication, blood pressure, and laboratory data at first and last clinic visits.
- Descriptive analysis of data from 74 patients with available visit data.
Main Results:
- Significant improvements observed in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (1.9 to 1.5 mmol/L) and hemoglobin A1C (7.5% to 7.1%).
- Increased proportion of patients achieving blood pressure target (52.7% to 36.5%) and higher uptake of statins, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists.
- High baseline use of RAAS inhibitors (81.8%) with no significant change; opportunities remain for SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Conclusions:
- The C.a.R.E. Clinic demonstrates feasibility and potential effectiveness in improving evidence-based and patient-centered care for complex patients.
- Improvements in clinical markers and medication uptake suggest a positive impact of the multidisciplinary approach.
- Limitations include the lack of a control group, preventing causal attribution of improvements solely to the clinic.
Background:
Patients with diabetes and co-existing chronic kidney disease and/or cardiovascular disease have complex medical needs with multiple indications for different guideline-directed medical therapies and require high health care resource utilization. The Cardiac and Renal Endocrine Clinic (C.a.R.E. Clinic) is a multi- and interdisciplinary clinic offering a unique care model to this population to overcome barriers to optimal care.
Objective:
To describe the patient characteristics and clinical data of consecutive patients seen in the C.a.R.E. Clinic between 2014 and 2020, with a focus on the feasibility, strengths, and challenges of this outpatient care model.
Design:
Single-center retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
The C.a.R.E. Clinic is a multi- and interdisciplinary clinic at Toronto General Hospital in Toronto, Canada.
Patients:
We reviewed the charts of all 118 patients who had been referred to the C.a.R.E. Clinic with type 2 diabetes mellitus, co-existing renal disease, and/or cardiovascular disease.
Measurements:
Demographic data, medication data, clinic blood pressure measurements, and laboratory data were assessed at the first and last available clinic visit.
Methods:
Data were extracted via manual chart review of paper and electronic medical records.
Results:
First and last attended clinic visit data were available for descriptive analysis in 74 patients. There was a significant improvement in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (1.9 mmol/L vs 1.5 mmol/L, P < .01), hemoglobin A1C (7.5% vs 7.1%, P = .02), and the proportion of patients with blood pressure at target (52.7% vs 36.5%, P = .04), but not body mass index (29.7 kg/m² vs 29.6 kg/m², P = .15) between the last and first available clinic visits. There was higher uptake in evidence-based medication use including statins (93.2% vs 81.1%, P = .01), SGLT-2i (35.1% vs 4.1%, P < .01), and GLP-1 receptor agonists (13.5% vs 4.1%, P = .02), while RAAS inhibitor use was already high at baseline (81.8% vs 78.4%, P = .56). There remains a significant opportunity for therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.
Limitations:
This is a retrospective chart review lacking a control group, therefore clinical improvements cannot be causally attributed to the clinic alone. New evidence and changes to guideline-recommended therapies also contributed to practice changes during this time period.
Conclusions:
A multi- and interdisciplinary clinic is a feasible and potentially effective way to improve evidence-based and patient-centered care for patients with diabetes, kidney, and cardiovascular disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction

