Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Alice through the Looking-glass: Can We Improve Peer Review?
Nikolaos Papanas1, Dimitri P Mikhailidis2
1Diabetes Centre-Diabetic Foot Clinic, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Abstract:
Peer review is an essential component for the evaluation of material submitted to medical and scientific journals. This process usually involves single blind, double blind or open peer review. In the present Editorial, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these peer review options. Our comments are influenced by our experience as Editors-in-Chief. We also outline new developments in the field of peer review.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Proofreading
Feedback Inhibition
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Feedback Loops
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

