Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Safety and Efficacy of Periprocedural Bridging With Cangrelor Versus Eptifibatide
Allison N Yun1, Alex Y Toyoda, Edmond J Solomon
1Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Insights
For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, cangrelor and eptifibatide showed similar safety and efficacy for bridging therapy. However, cangrelor offers significant cost savings, making it a potentially more economical choice for select patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Dual antiplatelet therapy interruption is common for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.
- Periprocedural bridging strategies are employed for high thrombotic risk patients.
- Cangrelor (reversible P2Y12 inhibitor) and eptifibatide (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) are used for bridging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of cangrelor versus eptifibatide for periprocedural bridging in patients with coronary stents.
- To evaluate bleeding events, cardiac adverse events, and cost-effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study.
- Inclusion of 75 patients bridged with either cangrelor (n=50) or eptifibatide (n=25).
- Primary outcome: bleeding events (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries criteria); Secondary outcomes: transfusion, major adverse cardiac events, cost savings.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in mild, moderate, or severe bleeding events between cangrelor and eptifibatide groups.
- Similar rates of composite inpatient major cardiac adverse events.
- Average cost savings of $5824 per patient favoring cangrelor over eptifibatide for equivalent duration.
Conclusions:
- Cangrelor and eptifibatide demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy as periprocedural bridging agents in patients with coronary stents.
- Cangrelor presents a substantial cost-saving opportunity when substituted for eptifibatide in select patient populations.
- Further research is warranted to define optimal use in high thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk patients.
Abstract:
Patients with percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing procedures often require interruptions in their dual antiplatelet therapy. Periprocedural bridging is considered for patients at high thrombotic risk using intravenous cangrelor, a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor with a short half-life, or eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, with a slightly longer half-life but less costly alternative. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cangrelor compared with eptifibatide when used in a periprocedural setting. The primary outcome of this retrospective cohort study was the incidence of bleeding events defined by the global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria, and the secondary outcomes include the transfusion requirements, inpatient major cardiac adverse events, and cost savings per patient. A total of 75 patients were included who were bridged to procedures (cangrelor, n = 50; eptifibatide, n = 25). There were no significant differences in overall bleeding events defined by global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria: mild bleeding [8% (n= 4) vs. 8% (n= 2); P = 0.68], moderate bleeding [28% (n = 14) vs. 48% (n = 12); P = 0.07), and severe bleeding [8% (n = 4) vs. 8% (n = 2); P = 0.25] between cangrelor and eptifibatide. The composite inpatient major cardiac adverse events were also similar between cangrelor and eptifibatide [10% (n = 10) vs. 8% (n = 8); P = 0.78]. The average cost savings per each cangrelor patient on the equivalent duration of eptifibatide was calculated out to be $5824 per patient. Cangrelor and eptifibatide were similar in terms of safety and efficacy when used as a bridge in patients with recent coronary stents, but considerable cost savings could be made if cangrelor was substituted for by eptifibatide in select patients. Further studies are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk.
Related Concept Videos
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

