Topical hedgehog inhibitors for basal cell carcinoma: how far away are we?

The standard treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) consists of conventional excision or Mohs micrographic surgery. However, surgical excision is not feasible in specific cases, particularly in patients with several BCCs such as those with Gorlin syndrome or individuals receiving immunosuppression after solid-organ transplantation. Additionally, the geriatric population may not be appropriate candidates for surgery. Thus, alternative therapies are needed for these populations.

Hedgehog (Hh) inhibitors are approved and effective but are currently available only in oral formulations. These agents such as vismodegib and sonidegib are associated with short-lived responses as well as significant adverse effects including myalgias, dysgeusia, and alopecia. Patidegib and itraconazole are two topical Hh inhibitors agents emerging as alternatives to oral Hh inhibiton for difficult-to-treat BCCs. These agents exhibit limited systemic absorption, leading to improved tolerability; however, an optimal formulation is needed to maximize efficacy and is currently being investigated.

Ongoing and recent clinical studies on topical Hedgehog inhibitors show great promise for the development of an agent with a high therapeutic index and limited adverse effects. If patidegib continues to show clinical efficacy in randomized controlled trials, it may become a universal therapy for all subtypes of difficult-to-treat BCC.