Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Infant Formulas With Postbiotics: An Updated Systematic Review
Hania Szajewska1, Maciej Kołodziej, Agata Skórka
1Department of Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Insights
Infant formulas (IF) with postbiotics are safe and well-tolerated for non-breastfed infants. However, current evidence is insufficient to confirm clinical benefits or differentiate between specific postbiotic IF products.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Microbiology
- Nutrition Science
Background:
- Postbiotics, derived from inanimate microorganisms or their components, are increasingly incorporated into infant formulas (IF).
- Evidence on the safety and health impacts of postbiotic IF compared to standard IF requires systematic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and update evidence on the safety and health effects of infant formulas containing postbiotics.
- To compare postbiotic IF, with or without additional modifications, against standard IF.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to December 2021.
- Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the review.
- Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, with most trials showing high risk or some concerns.
Main Results:
- Infant formulas fermented with *Bifidobacterium breve* C50 and *Streptococcus thermophilus* (BB/ST) were found to be safe and well-tolerated compared to standard IF.
- Postbiotic formulas with additional modifications (e.g., prebiotics, altered fat content) were generally safe but did not demonstrate clear, replicated benefits.
- Limited data were available for formulas containing *Lactobacillus paracasei* CBA L74.
Conclusions:
- Current infant formulas with postbiotics are safe and well-tolerated for infants unable to be breastfed.
- Insufficient evidence exists to draw firm conclusions on the clinical efficacy or comparative benefits of different postbiotic IF formulations.
- Consultation with healthcare providers is recommended to weigh the evidence, expected benefits, and costs of specific modified infant formulas.
Objectives:
Infant formulas (IF) with postbiotics, defined as inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confer a health benefit on the host, are available. We systematically updated evidence on the safety and health effects of administering iF with postbiotics (with or without other modifications) compared with standard IF.
Methods:
The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases were searched to December 2021.
Results:
Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, for the primary outcomes, 5 trials had an overall high risk of bias, and 6 trials had some concerns of bias. Most data were available on IF fermented with Bifidobacterium breve C50 and Streptococcus thermophilus (BB/ST). These formulas, compared with the standard IF, were safe and well tolerated. Postbiotic formulas with additional modifications (ie, formula fermented with BB/ST & prebiotics, partly fermented formula with BB/ST and prebiotics with or without modified milk fat, partly fermented antiregurgitation formula with BB/ST and prebiotics) were generally safe and well tolerated but did not offer clear benefits replicated in other studies. Only limited data were available on formula fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74.
Conclusions:
IF with postbiotics evaluated so far are safe and well tolerated by infants who cannot be breastfed. No firm conclusion can, however, be reached regarding the clinical effects and benefit of one formula over another. It seems reasonable to discuss with healthcare providers current evidence regarding specific modifications in infant formulas and let them decide whether the expected benefits meet expectations and are worth the cost.
More Related Videos
04:16Individualized Reconstitution of Human Milk Microbiota: A Feasible Approach in Real-World Settings
Published on: February 7, 2025
09:36Effect of Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa on an In Vitro Model of Preterm Small Intestinal Injury and Healing Using Enteroid-Derived Monolayers
Published on: July 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS