Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Synthesis of a Borylated Ibuprofen Derivative Through Suzuki Cross-Coupling and Alkene Boracarboxylation Reactions
Published on: November 30, 2022
Machine Learning May Sometimes Simply Capture Literature Popularity Trends: A Case Study of Heterocyclic
Wiktor Beker1,2, Rafał Roszak1,2, Agnieszka Wołos1,2
1Allchemy, Inc., Highland, Indiana 46322, United States.
Machine learning (ML) models struggle to predict optimal Suzuki-Miyaura coupling conditions, even with extensive literature data. This suggests a need for systematically generated, standardized datasets for training chemical reactivity models.
Area of Science:
- Synthetic Chemistry
- Machine Learning
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Machine learning (ML) is increasingly applied to predict chemical reactivity using literature data.
- Accurate predictive models are crucial for optimizing synthetic chemistry reactions.
- The assumption is that large datasets enable robust model construction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ML models in predicting optimal reaction conditions for Suzuki-Miyaura coupling.
- To determine if curated literature data is sufficient for accurate ML-driven chemical reactivity prediction.
- To identify limitations of current ML approaches in synthetic chemistry.
Main Methods:
- A curated database of over 10,000 literature examples of Suzuki-Miyaura coupling was utilized.
- Various ML models, including feed-forward and graph-convolution neural networks, were applied.
- Different chemical representations (fingerprints, descriptors, latent representations) were tested.
- Model performance was compared against naive frequency-based assignments.
Main Results:
- ML models failed to provide meaningful predictions for optimal reaction conditions (solvents, bases).
- Performance did not significantly improve across different ML architectures or chemical representations.
- ML predictions were not substantially better than random guessing based on common conditions.
Conclusions:
- Abundant, curated literature data alone is insufficient for training accurate ML models in synthetic chemistry.
- Biases in literature reporting (e.g., subjective preferences, reagent availability) and lack of negative data hinder ML performance.
- Systematic generation of reliable, standardized datasets is crucial for advancing ML in chemical reactivity prediction.
More Related Videos
19:58Palladium N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes: Synthesis from Benzimidazolium Salts and Catalytic Activity in Carbon-carbon Bond-forming Reactions
Published on: July 30, 2017
07:06A Microwave-Assisted Direct Heteroarylation of Ketones Using Transition Metal Catalysis
Published on: February 16, 2020
Related Concept Videos
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as...
Five-Membered Heterocyclic Aromatic Compounds: Overview
Basicity of Heterocyclic Aromatic Amines
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...