Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients
Domenico Grieco1, Edoardo Bressi2,3,4, Kamil Sedláček5
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Policlinico Casilino of Rome, Via Casilina, 1049, 00169, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a safe and effective method for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in elderly patients. This study shows LBBAP successfully reduced QRS duration and improved ejection fraction with low complication rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging technique for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- Its feasibility and safety in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block remain under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of LBBAP-CRT in elderly patients (≥75 years) compared to younger patients (<75 years).
- To compare pacing parameters and complication rates between the two age groups over a 6-month follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Consecutive patients indicated for CRT were enrolled.
- Pacing parameters and complication rates were compared between elderly and younger LBBAP-CRT recipients.
- A 6-month follow-up period was utilized.
Main Results:
- LBBAP was successful in 92% of patients (45% elderly).
- Both groups showed significant QRS duration reduction and LVEF improvement (p<0.0001).
- Pacing thresholds, R wave amplitudes, fluoroscopic and procedural times were comparable. Complication rates were low and similar between groups.
Conclusions:
- LBBAP is a feasible and safe pacing technique for elderly CRT candidates.
- It provides physiological pacing with effective QRS and LVEF improvements.
- Low complication rates support LBBAP as a viable CRT option for the elderly.
Background:
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging technique to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its feasibility and safety in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block is hardly investigated.
Methods:
We enrolled consecutive patients with an indication for CRT comparing pacing parameters and complication rates of LBBAP-CRT in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) versus younger patients (< 75 years) over a 6-month follow-up.
Results:
LBBAP was successful in 55/60 enrolled patients (92%), among which 25(45%) were elderly. In both groups, LBBAP significantly reduced the QRS duration (elderly group: 168 ± 15 ms to 136 ± 12 ms, p < 0.0001; younger group: 166 ± 14 ms to 134 ± 11 ms, p < 0.0001) and improved LVEF (elderly group: 28 ± 5% to 40 ± 7%, p < 0.0001; younger group: 29 ± 5% to 41 ± 8%, p < 0.0001). The pacing threshold was 0.9 ± 0.8 V in the elderly group vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 V in the younger group (p = 0.350). The R wave was 9.5 ± 3.9 mV in elderly patients vs. 10.7 ± 2.7 mV in younger patients (p = 0.341). The fluoroscopic (elderly: 13 ± 7 min vs. younger: 11 ± 7 min, p = 0.153) and procedural time (elderly: 80 ± 20 min vs. younger: 78 ± 16 min, p = 0.749) were comparable between groups. Lead dislodgement occurred in 2(4%) patients, 1 in each group (p = 1.000). Intraprocedural septal perforation occurred in three patients (5%), 2(8%) in the elderly group (p = 0.585). One patient (2%) in the elderly group had a pocket infection.
Conclusions:
LBBAP is a feasible and safe technique for delivering physiological pacing in elderly patients who are candidates for CRT with suitable pacing parameters and low complication rates.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy


