Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Combined Coronary CT-Angiography and TAVI Planning: Utility of CT-FFR in Patients with Morphologically Ruled-Out
Robin Fabian Gohmann1,2, Patrick Seitz1, Konrad Pawelka1,2
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Insights
Machine learning-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) often miscategorizes coronary artery disease (CAD) in pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients. This method may increase false positives for CAD, especially in distal segments, irrespective of image quality or calcium scores.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
- Excluding significant CAD via coronary CT-angiography (cCTA) can avoid invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
- High plaque burden can complicate CAD exclusion on cCTA, particularly for less experienced readers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of machine learning (ML)-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in categorizing cCTA studies without obstructive CAD in pre-TAVI patients.
- To assess the correlation of CT-FFR recategorization with image quality and coronary artery calcium score (CAC).
Main Methods:
- 116 patients without significant stenosis (≥50% diameter) on pre-TAVI cCTA were included.
- ML-based CT-FFR (threshold = 0.80) was used for re-evaluation, with ICA as the reference standard.
- Quantitative and qualitative assessments of image quality and CAC were performed.
Main Results:
- ML-based CT-FFR was successfully applied in 94.0% of patients (109/116) and 436 vessels.
- CT-FFR falsely categorized 76/109 patients and 126/436 vessels as having significant CAD.
- Recategorization occurred mainly in distal segments and showed minimal correlation with image quality or CAC.
Conclusions:
- Unselective application of CT-FFR may significantly increase false positive CAD ratings compared to morphological assessment.
- CT-FFR recategorization is largely independent of image quality or CAC and predominantly affects distal coronary segments.
- The clinical significance of reduced CT-FFR in severe aortic stenosis patients requires further investigation.
Abstract:
: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a frequent comorbidity in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). If significant CAD can be excluded on coronary CT-angiography (cCTA), invasive coronary angiography (ICA) may be avoided. However, a high plaque burden may make the exclusion of CAD challenging, particularly for less experienced readers. The objective was to analyze the ability of machine learning (ML)-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) to correctly categorize cCTA studies without obstructive CAD acquired during pre-TAVI evaluation and to correlate recategorization to image quality and coronary artery calcium score (CAC). : In total, 116 patients without significant stenosis (≥50% diameter) on cCTA as part of pre-TAVI CT were included. Patients were examined with an electrocardiogram-gated CT scan of the heart and high-pitch scan of the torso. Patients were re-evaluated with ML-based CT-FFR (threshold = 0.80). The standard of reference was ICA. Image quality was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively. : ML-based CT-FFR was successfully performed in 94.0% (109/116) of patients, including 436 vessels. With CT-FFR, 76/109 patients and 126/436 vessels were falsely categorized as having significant CAD. With CT-FFR 2/2 patients but no vessels initially falsely classified by cCTA were correctly recategorized as having significant CAD. Reclassification occurred predominantly in distal segments. Virtually no correlation was found between image quality or CAC. : Unselectively applied, CT-FFR may vastly increase the number of false positive ratings of CAD compared to morphological scoring. Recategorization was virtually independently from image quality or CAC and occurred predominantly in distal segments. It is unclear whether or not the reduced CT-FFR represent true pressure ratios and potentially signifies pathophysiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

