Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Published on: April 26, 2015
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
Tobias Schupp1, Michael Behnes1, Mohammad Abumayyaleh1
1First Department of Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim (UMM), Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research) Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Insights
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) show similar long-term mortality and arrhythmic event risks in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. ACEi, however, was linked to reduced cardiac rehospitalization rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) are primarily studied for heart failure and myocardial infarction.
- Limited data exist on their role in secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by reducing ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
- ACEi/ARB may prevent adverse cardiac remodeling, potentially lowering the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and SCD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the comparative prognostic role of ACEi versus ARB in patients experiencing ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF).
- To assess the impact of ACEi and ARB on all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events, and cardiac rehospitalization.
Main Methods:
- A large retrospective registry analysis of patients with VT or VF from 2002 to 2015.
- Primary outcome: all-cause mortality at three years.
- Secondary outcomes: composite arrhythmic endpoint (VT/VF recurrence, ICD therapies, SCD) and cardiac rehospitalization.
Main Results:
- 1236 patients were included; 85% received ACEi, 15% ARB.
- No significant difference in three-year all-cause mortality (20% vs. 17%) or composite arrhythmic endpoint risk between ACEi and ARB groups.
- ACEi use was associated with a significantly decreased risk of cardiac rehospitalization at three years (HR=0.690).
- Propensity score matched analysis confirmed comparable long-term outcomes.
Conclusions:
- ACEi and ARB demonstrate comparable efficacy regarding long-term mortality and arrhythmic events in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
- ACEi may offer a benefit in reducing cardiac rehospitalization compared to ARB in this patient population.
- Further research could explore mechanisms behind reduced rehospitalization with ACEi.
Abstract:
Data investigating the prognostic value of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) usually focusses on patients presenting with heart failure (HF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, by preventing adverse cardiac remodeling, ACEi/ARB may also decrease the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although ventricular tachyarrhythmias are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, only limited data are available focusing on the prognostic role of ACEi/ARB, when prescribed for secondary prevention of SCD. Therefore, this study comprehensively investigates the role of ACEi versus ARB in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ICD therapies and sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. A total of 1236 patients were included (15% treated with ARB and 85% with ACEi) and followed for a median of 4.0 years. At three years, ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term mortality (20% vs. 17%; log rank p = 0.287; HR = 0.965; 95% CI 0.689-1.351; p = 0.835) and comparable risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (HR = 1.227; 95% CI 0.841-1.790; p = 0.288). In contrast, ACEi was associated with a decreased risk of cardiac rehospitalization at three years (HR = 0.690; 95% CI 0.490-0.971; p = 0.033). Within the propensity score matched cohort (i.e., 158 patients with ACEi and ARB), ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term outcomes at three years. In conclusion, ACEi and ARB are associated with comparable risk of long-term outcomes in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers

