Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Integrating quantitative and qualitative methodologies to build a national R&D plan using data envelopment analysis
1Science and Technology Management Policy, University of Science & Technology, Daejeon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea.
Government R&D investment decisions for smart farms can be distorted. This study proposes a quantitative approach integrating expert opinions to improve R&D performance and budget allocation for policymakers.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Economics
- Public Policy
Background:
- National R&D investment is increasing, necessitating improved decision-making systems for R&D performance and budget efficiency.
- Effective allocation of limited national R&D resources requires sound decision-making at both the selection and pursuit stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the theoretical efficiency of R&D investment in smart farm technologies.
- To compare quantitative R&D investment analysis with expert opinions reflecting real-world conditions.
- To provide policymakers with a quantitative approach for R&D investment decisions, incorporating field experiences.
Main Methods:
- Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) with an Assurance Region model.
- Integration of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with DEA.
- Incorporation of expert opinions to refine R&D investment priorities.
Main Results:
- R&D actor perspectives (academia, industry, research) did not significantly influence investment allocation decisions in the smart farm sector.
- The relative efficiency of certain R&D technologies increased when expert qualitative insights were integrated.
- Government top-down decision-making was found to potentially distort R&D investment allocation, excluding necessary technology groups.
Conclusions:
- A quantitative approach integrating expert opinions can compensate for distortions in top-down national R&D investment decisions.
- The Korean government's R&D investment priorities in smart farms showed considerable distortion when compared to expert-informed analysis.
- This study offers an alternative methodology for policymakers to ensure more accurate and effective R&D investment allocation.
Related Concept Videos
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Development of Analytical Methods

