Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Monitoring Immune Cells Trafficking Fluorescent Prion Rods Hours after Intraperitoneal Infection
Published on: November 19, 2010
Detection and Transmission of Proteus mirabilis in Immunodeficient Mice
Rebecca K Tierce1, Adrienne A Winn2, Theresa M Albers3
1VelociGene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York; New York University-Regeneron Veterinary Postdoctoral Training Program in Laboratory Animal Medicine, New York, New York;,
Abstract:
The exclusion of opportunistic pathogens is important for protecting animal health and ensuring desired research outcomes in highly immunodeficient mice. Proteus mirabilis has been associated with gastrointestinal tract lesions, septicemia, pyelonephritis, splenomegaly, and hepatitis and can influence select mouse models. To inform health-surveillance practices after we experienced difficulty in excluding P. mirabilis from our mouse colony, we aimed to determine the likelihood of detecting P. mirabilis-positive immunocompromised (SRG), immunovague (Fbn1+/-), and immunocompetent (CD1) colony mice through culture and PCR testing; to evaluate transmission via 2 sentinel-based approaches (direct contact and indirect dirty-bedding transfer); and to further characterize associated pathology. We hypothesized that immunocompromised mice would be better detectors and transmitters of P. mirabilis. Multiple logistic regression models were used for analysis and included PCR copy number, repeated testing, age, sex, and antibiotic-treated (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) diet as covariates. Repeated testing over 10 wk showed that P. mirabilis -colonized immunocompromised colony mice were 95 times more likely than immunocompetent mice to test positive by culture and 30 times more likely by PCR assay. Sentinel mice were 15 times more likely to test positive by PCR assay for P. mirabilis when exposed by direct contact compared with dirty bedding and 18 times more likely to test positive when exposed to positive immunocompromised as compared with immunocompetent colony mice. After 10 wk of exposure, 3.8% of dirty-bedding sentinel PCR tests were positive, as compared with 30.7% of contact sentinels. Only immunocompromised mice on antibiotic diet (37.5%) developed lesions of the urogenital tract and abdominal cavity consistent with known pathology of P. mirabilis. Our findings suggest that PCR testing of dirty-bedding sentinels alone is not sufficient for the detection of P. mirabilis in mouse colonies. Direct-contact sentinels and testing of colony mice-especially if immunocompromised-with adjunct culture may facilitate successful bioexclusion.
Insights
Detecting Proteus mirabilis in mouse colonies is crucial for animal health. Immunocompromised mice are better P. mirabilis detectors, and direct contact sentinels are more effective than dirty bedding for surveillance.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Pathology
- Microbiology
- Animal Health Surveillance
Background:
- Opportunistic pathogens like Proteus mirabilis pose risks to animal health and research integrity.
- P. mirabilis can cause significant pathology in mice, impacting experimental outcomes.
- Effective bioexclusion strategies are vital for maintaining healthy mouse colonies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the detection rates of P. mirabilis in immunocompromised, immunovague, and immunocompetent mice.
- To evaluate the efficacy of direct contact and dirty-bedding sentinel methods for P. mirabilis transmission.
- To characterize P. mirabilis-associated pathology in different mouse models.
Main Methods:
- Culture and PCR testing were used to detect P. mirabilis in colony mice.
- Sentinel mice were exposed via direct contact or dirty-bedding transfer.
- Logistic regression models analyzed factors influencing detection rates, including mouse immune status and diet.
Main Results:
- Immunocompromised mice were significantly more likely to test positive for P. mirabilis (95x by culture, 30x by PCR) than immunocompetent mice.
- Direct contact sentinels detected P. mirabilis more effectively (30.7%) than dirty-bedding sentinels (3.8%).
- Only immunocompromised mice on antibiotic diet developed P. mirabilis-related lesions.
Conclusions:
- PCR testing of dirty-bedding sentinels is insufficient for P. mirabilis detection.
- Direct-contact sentinels and PCR/culture testing of colony mice, particularly immunocompromised ones, improve P. mirabilis surveillance.
- Enhanced health-surveillance protocols are needed for P. mirabilis bioexclusion in mouse facilities.
More Related Videos
09:15A Mouse Model to Assess Innate Immune Response to Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Published on: February 28, 2019
08:34Generation of In-Frame Gene Deletion Mutants in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Testing for Virulence Attenuation in a Simple Mouse Model of Infection
Published on: January 8, 2020