Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

172
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
172
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

131
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
131

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A template Bayesian network for combining forensic evidence on an item with an uncertain relation to the disputed activities.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2024
Same author

A collection of idioms for modeling activity level evaluations in forensic science.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2023
Same author

The use of δ(2)H and δ(18)O isotopic analyses combined with chemometrics as a traceability tool for the geographical origin of bell peppers.

Food chemistry·2016
Same author

Probabilistic peak detection for first-order chromatographic data.

Analytica chimica acta·2014
Same author

Selection of a plant-bacterium pair as a novel tool for rhizostimulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria.

Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI·2001
Same author

Increased uptake of putrescine in the rhizosphere inhibits competitive root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain WCS365.

Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.3K

Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework.

S C A Uitdehaag1, T H Donders2, I Kuiper3

  • 1Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044, 2490 AA The Hague, The Netherlands; Utrecht University, Department of Physical Geography, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|March 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Bayesian networks help forensic scientists analyze complex soil comparisons. This study provides templates for building these networks to evaluate evidence and guide research.

Keywords:
Activity levelBayesian networkDistance measureElemental compositionEvaluate propositionsPalynologySoil comparisonSource level

More Related Videos

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.9K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
09:44

Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon

Published on: October 16, 2018

10.3K
Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
11:49

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

15.9K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.0K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Forensic soil comparisons offer significant evidential value but present complexities due to multiple analytical methods and influencing factors.
  • Bayesian networks offer a robust framework for managing and interpreting complex probabilistic information in forensic casework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the application of Bayesian networks in forensic soil comparison.
  • To provide a structural template for constructing case-specific Bayesian networks.
  • To demonstrate the utility of Bayesian networks for evaluating source-level and activity-level propositions in forensic soil analysis.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines the structural components of a Bayesian network relevant to forensic soil analysis.
  • It details the types of input and output data required for network construction and evaluation.
  • Two case examples are presented: one focusing on source-level propositions and the other on activity-level propositions.

Main Results:

  • The developed Bayesian network structures provide a clear framework for integrating diverse soil evidence data.
  • The evaluated examples demonstrate how to apply these networks to specific forensic scenarios.
  • Sensitivity analysis of the networks can identify key factors influencing the evidential weight of soil comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian networks are a valuable tool for forensic practitioners dealing with complex soil comparison cases.
  • The provided templates and examples facilitate the construction and application of case-specific networks.
  • This approach aids in assessing the evidential value of soil data and highlights areas for future research in forensic soil science.