Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: February 1, 2018
Effects of paired stimulation with specific waveforms on cortical and spinal plasticity in subjects with a chronic
Muhammad Adeel1, Chien-Hung Lai2, Bor-Shing Lin3
1School of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; International Ph.D. Program in Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background/Purpose:
Paired stimulation can cause neuroplasticity in corticospinal and spinal pathways in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to know the effects of different waveforms using paired stimulations with bicycling in subjects with a chronic SCI.
Methods:
Recruited subjects with an SCI underwent three treatment interventions in random order for 4-20 min followed by 30 min of bicycling (control, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rTMS) at 20 Hz with transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with tsDCS with a 1-week gap period. A TMS method was employed to record the resting motor threshold (RMT), the 90% values of which was used as the stimulation intensity, and the Hoffman (H)-reflex was measured by stimulating the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, MEP peak-to-peak amplitude, and H-reflex latency as primary variables and lower extremity motor scale (LEMS) and modified Ashworth spasticity scale (MAS) as secondary variables were analyzed before and after the interventions.
Results:
The MEP latency, MEP amplitude, and LEMS significantly improved with the rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS or the rTMS-20 Hz/tsDCS (p < 0.050) protocols compared to the control intervention. All other outcome measures, including RMT, H-reflex latency, and MAS score showed some changes but did not fully attain a level of significance.
Conclusion:
The paired stimulation with rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS was equally effective to produce neuroplastic effect in subjects with chronic SCI compared to the conventional TMS-20 Hz/tsDCS intervention.
More Related Videos
14:56The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018
06:55Author Spotlight: Advancing Spinal Cord Stimulation - Exploring the Cellular Responses of Motor Neurons Through Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology
Published on: September 8, 2023