Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: In Honour of Professor Margaret Brazier: Memories of Margot.

Medical law review·2025
Same author

Value sensitive design and the artificial placenta.

Journal of medical ethics·2024
Same author

Death and the artificial placenta.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2024
Same author

AAPT, pregnancy loss and planning ahead.

Journal of medical ethics·2024
Same author

Artificial placentas, pregnancy loss and loss-sensitive care.

Journal of medical ethics·2023
Same author

The relationship between speculation and translation in Bioethics: methods and methodologies.

Monash bioethics review·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.8K

Assisted gestative technologies.

Elizabeth Chloe Romanis1

  • 1Gender and Law at Durham, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK elizabeth.c.romanis@durham.ac.uk.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|March 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Assisted gestative technologies (AGTs), including surrogacy and uterus transplantation, present unique ethical and legal challenges. A broader regulatory discussion is needed to encompass these evolving reproductive technologies.

Keywords:
EthicsIn Vitro TechniquesReproductive Medicine

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

872
Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

797

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

13.8K
Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
07:46

Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility

Published on: August 9, 2024

872
Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision
08:15

Capturing Dynamic Finger Gesturing with High-resolution Surface Electromyography and Computer Vision

Published on: March 28, 2025

797

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law and Ethics

Background:

  • Existing literature on assisted conception often overlooks surrogacy's unique demands, such as reproductive labor.
  • Surrogacy is a form of assisted gestation, distinct from assisted conception methods like gamete donation.
  • Emerging technologies like uterus transplantation (UTx) and artificial placentas expand options for genetically related parenthood without self-gestation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between technologies assisting conception and those assisting gestation, highlighting unique ethical and legal issues of assisted gestative technologies (AGTs).
  • To advocate for viewing AGTs as a unified category, recognizing their shared function for intended parents.
  • To argue for a consolidated ethical, social, and legal analysis of surrogacy, UTx, and ectogestation due to overlapping concerns.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of assisted conception versus assisted gestation technologies.
  • Comparative review of ethical, social, and legal issues across surrogacy, UTx, and ectogestation.
  • Examination of regulatory frameworks and their potential adaptation for emerging AGTs.

Main Results:

  • AGT's distinct ethical and legal considerations arise from their role in gestation, not just conception.
  • Surrogacy, UTx, and ectogestation share significant ethical, social, and legal challenges, justifying unified analysis.
  • Current reforms for surrogacy will likely influence the governance of other AGTs.

Conclusions:

  • A broader regulatory conversation is essential to accommodate diverse AGTs, including surrogacy, UTx, and ectogestation.
  • Treating AGTs as a spectrum of alternatives necessitates inclusive legal and ethical frameworks.
  • Anticipating and integrating emerging reproductive technologies into revised regulatory schemes is crucial.