Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.2K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.2K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

9.8K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
9.8K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

24.7K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.7K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

639
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
639
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

40.2K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
40.2K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

56.1K
Overview
56.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Elderly Patients with Crohn's Disease: Real World Evidence From the ENEIDA Registry.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2022
Same author

Real-World Evidence of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Journal of clinical medicine·2022
Same author

Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2022
Same author

Performance of Screening Strategies for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from the ENEIDA Registry of GETECCU.

Journal of clinical medicine·2022
Same author

Empirical vs. Susceptibility-Guided Treatment of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Frontiers in microbiology·2022
Same author

Effectiveness and Safety of High-Dose Dual Therapy: Results of the European Registry on the Management of <i>Helicobacter</i><i>pylori</i> Infection (Hp-EuReg).

Journal of clinical medicine·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.5K

Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer.

Javier P Gisbert1, María Chaparro1

  • 1Servicio del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España.

Gastroenterologia Y Hepatologia
|March 12, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Peer review is the gold standard for ensuring scientific article quality. This guide explores the peer review process, its importance, and how to conduct effective manuscript evaluations, aiming to encourage more researchers to become reviewers.

Keywords:
EvaluadorEvaluatorInvestigaciónInvestigationPeer reviewPublicaciónPublicationRevisión por pares

More Related Videos

Do's and Don'ts of Cryo-electron Microscopy: A Primer on Sample Preparation and High Quality Data Collection for Macromolecular 3D Reconstruction
09:25

Do's and Don'ts of Cryo-electron Microscopy: A Primer on Sample Preparation and High Quality Data Collection for Macromolecular 3D Reconstruction

Published on: January 9, 2015

46.4K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

2.5K
Do's and Don'ts of Cryo-electron Microscopy: A Primer on Sample Preparation and High Quality Data Collection for Macromolecular 3D Reconstruction
09:25

Do's and Don'ts of Cryo-electron Microscopy: A Primer on Sample Preparation and High Quality Data Collection for Macromolecular 3D Reconstruction

Published on: January 9, 2015

46.4K
An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
08:29

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Scientific journals are crucial for disseminating novel research.
  • Peer review is the established standard for validating scientific article quality.
  • Effective peer review benefits both authors and journal editors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive examination of the scientific peer review process.
  • To elucidate the significance and historical context of peer review.
  • To encourage researchers to actively participate as peer reviewers.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of the peer review process, its history, and importance.
  • Discussion of the motivations and fundamental rules for conducting manuscript reviews.
  • Analysis of peer review report structure, content, and resolution options.
  • Focus on ethical considerations and common errors in manuscript evaluation.
  • Identification of peer review limitations and suggestions for improvement.

Main Results:

  • A detailed overview of the peer review process, from its origins to its current standing.
  • Guidance on best practices for manuscript evaluation, including ethical standards and common pitfalls.
  • Insights into the structure and components of a comprehensive peer review report.
  • Identification of inherent limitations within the current peer review system.

Conclusions:

  • The manuscript aims to demystify the peer review process for researchers.
  • It provides actionable advice for conducting high-quality reviews and encourages greater participation.
  • Understanding and improving peer review is essential for the integrity of scientific publishing.