Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of new diagnostic imaging technologies.

M A Lerner

    Israel Journal of Medical Sciences
    |March 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    Evaluating new imaging technologies requires assessing safety, utility, and diagnostic accuracy. Comparative studies determine if new methods complement or replace older ones, focusing on therapeutic benefit for clinical adoption.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Purification and expansion of human Schwann cells in vitro.

    Nature medicine·1995
    Same author

    Nasopharyngeal profile and velopharyngeal valve mechanism.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1993
    Same author

    The otolaryngologist and the patient with velocardiofacial syndrome.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·1993
    Same author

    Pneumothorax due to delayed rupture of traumatic trans-diaphragmatic gastric hernia.

    European journal of radiology·1990
    Same author

    Radiological case of the month. Dyke-Davidoff-Masson syndrome.

    American journal of diseases of children (1960)·1988
    Same author

    Primary CT diagnosis of gastrointestinal masses.

    Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society·1985

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Imaging
    • Diagnostic Technology Evaluation

    Background:

    • New imaging technologies require rigorous evaluation for safety and clinical utility.
    • Assessment must consider biological uniqueness, visualization quality, and diagnostic accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically compare evaluation methods for new imaging technologies.
    • To analyze the historical progression of technology assessment phases.
    • To emphasize therapeutic benefit as the primary consideration.

    Main Methods:

    • Detailed comparison of large cooperative studies by academic clinicians.
    • Analysis of methods used by publicly appointed assessors like the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, USA).
    • Evaluation of clinical setting assessments.

    Main Results:

    • Historically, technology evaluation evolved from lone innovators to cooperative studies, and recently to regulatory bodies like the FDA.
    • Clinical evaluation provides a more comprehensive assessment than methods used in earlier phases.
    • Comparative studies are crucial for understanding a new technology's role alongside existing methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The ultimate consideration for adopting new imaging technologies must be their therapeutic benefit, not solely image quality.
    • Regulatory bodies and clinical evaluations offer robust frameworks for assessing new imaging modalities.
    • A comprehensive evaluation ensures new technologies effectively contribute to patient care strategies.

    Related Experiment Videos