Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
61
Acquisition Time for Swept-Source Optical Biometry Plus Corneal Power Measurement During Cataract Evaluation
Ramón Ruiz-Mesa1, Maria Ruiz-Santos1, Julia Blanch-Ruiz1
1Cataract and Refractive Surgery Department, Oftalvist Jerez de la Frontera, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|March 14, 2022
Summary
The IOLMaster 700 with central topography offers efficient optical biometry and corneal power measurement, significantly reducing acquisition time compared to separate devices. However, keratometry readings from different devices are not interchangeable for cataract surgery planning.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Devices
- Optical Biometry
Background:
- Cataract evaluation requires accurate biometry and corneal power measurements.
- Current methods often involve multiple devices, potentially increasing procedure time.
- Optimizing acquisition time is crucial for improving clinical workflow in ophthalmology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the acquisition time of optical biometry and corneal power measurement using the IOLMaster 700 with integrated central topography versus the standard IOLMaster 700 combined with separate corneal topographers.
- To evaluate the agreement of keratometry (K), total keratometry (TK), and equivalent K reading (EKR) parameters between the devices.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational study included 96 eyes of 96 cataract patients.
- Acquisition times were recorded for the IOLMaster 700 with central topography, standard IOLMaster 700 alone, and combinations of standard IOLMaster 700 with Cassini or Pentacam HR.
- Agreement analysis was performed for K, TK, and EKR measurements.
Main Results:
- The IOLMaster 700 with central topography demonstrated statistically similar acquisition times to the standard IOLMaster 700 alone (p = 0.501), but was significantly faster than using separate topographers.
- Acquisition time was approximately three times shorter with the integrated device compared to combined devices.
- Statistically significant differences were found in K, TK, and EKR measurements between devices (p < 0.001), except between IOLMaster 700 and Cassini (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- The IOLMaster 700 with central topography provides an efficient workflow for cataract evaluation.
- Keratometry readings from the evaluated devices are not interchangeable due to clinically relevant differences.
- These differences may impact cataract surgery outcomes, necessitating careful consideration in clinical practice.

