Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Conformational Evaluation of HIV-1 Trimeric Envelope Glycoproteins Using a Cell-based ELISA Assay
Published on: September 14, 2014
Antigenic analysis of the HIV-1 envelope trimer implies small differences between structural states 1 and 2
Evan M Cale1, Jefferson I Driscoll1, Myungjin Lee1
1Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Researchers studied the dynamic structure of HIV-1 envelope trimers (Env) using single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET). They found significant structural differences between Env states, aiding understanding of broadly neutralizing antibody (bnAb) binding and HIV-1 entry.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Structural Biology
- Immunology
Background:
- The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope trimer (Env) is crucial for viral entry and a key target for broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs).
- Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) has identified at least three distinct conformational states of HIV-1 Env on virions.
- Most bnAbs elicited during natural infection preferentially bind to State 1, a prevalent prefusion conformation, while high-resolution structures exist for States 2 and 3, but not State 1.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the structural characteristics of HIV-1 Env in State 1, which remains structurally uncharacterized.
- To delineate antigenic differences between the smFRET-defined conformational states of HIV-1 Env.
- To correlate observed antigenic differences with known structural variations between Env States 2 and 3.
Main Methods:
- Enrichment of specific HIV-1 Env conformational states (States 1, 2, and 3) on cell surfaces using antibody fragments or small-molecule inhibitors.
- Assessment of binding affinities of various HIV-1 bnAbs to Env states enriched for specific conformations.
- Utilizing smFRET to define and differentiate conformational states of the HIV-1 Env trimer.
Main Results:
- Consistent, albeit small, differences in bnAb binding were observed between Env enriched in States 1 and 2.
- A greater than 10-fold difference in bnAb binding was detected between Env in States 1/2 compared to Env in State 3.
- These findings suggest substantial structural divergence between HIV-1 Env States 1 and 3.
Conclusions:
- The structural differences between HIV-1 Env States 1 and 3 are significantly larger than those between States 1 and 2.
- This study provides critical insights into the structural basis of State 1, informing the design of immunogens and therapeutic antibodies.
- Understanding Env conformational dynamics is essential for developing effective HIV-1 vaccines and treatments.
More Related Videos
07:29Determination of Molecular Structures of HIV Envelope Glycoproteins using Cryo-Electron Tomography and Automated Sub-tomogram Averaging
Published on: December 1, 2011
10:50Assessment of Immunologically Relevant Dynamic Tertiary Structural Features of the HIV-1 V3 Loop Crown R2 Sequence by ab initio Folding
Published on: September 15, 2010