Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

5.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
5.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.0K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

169
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
169
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

452
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
452
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.0K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk and resilience must be independently managed.

Nature·2020
Same author

A modular approach for assembly of quantitative adverse outcome pathways.

ALTEX·2019
Same author

A critical juncture for synthetic biology: Lessons from nanotechnology could inform public discourse and further development of synthetic biology.

EMBO reports·2018
Same author

Risk and resilience must be independently managed.

Nature·2018
Same author

Anthrax cleanup decisions: statistical confidence or confident response.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.

The Science of the total environment·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K

Multi-attribute COVID-19 policy evaluation under deep uncertainty.

Jack Mitcham1, Jeffrey Keisler1

  • 1College of Management, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA USA.

Annals of Operations Research
|March 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a framework to balance COVID-19 mitigation tradeoffs between life, liberty, and economy. It uses robust decision-making to identify strategies that perform well across various scenarios and value preferences.

Keywords:
COVID-19Minimax regretMulti-attribute utility theoryRobust decision-makingTradeoff analysisValue of life

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Economics
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • COVID-19 mitigation involves complex tradeoffs between public health, economic stability, and individual liberties.
  • Quantifying these tradeoffs and their impacts is challenging due to inherent uncertainties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust decision-making framework for evaluating COVID-19 mitigation strategies.
  • To incorporate competing values of life, liberty, and economy into a multi-attribute utility function.
  • To identify mitigation strategies that are resilient across diverse scenarios and societal preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Creation of a multi-attribute utility function balancing life, liberty, and economy.
  • Utilizing Robust Decision Making (RDM) to simulate outcomes under uncertainty.
  • Integration of compartmental epidemiological, economic, and liberty cost models.

Main Results:

  • No single weighting of utility function attributes is universally correct.
  • Simulation reveals strategy robustness across a spectrum of plausible outcomes and value judgments.
  • Identified strategies that maintain effectiveness despite uncertainty in disease characteristics, mitigation efficacy, and outcome valuation.

Conclusions:

  • Robust Decision Making provides a valuable approach for navigating complex policy decisions with competing values.
  • The framework supports evidence-based policy by identifying strategies resilient to uncertainty and value disagreements.
  • This approach aids in balancing public health imperatives with economic and liberty considerations during pandemics.