Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Vaccine eagerness: A new framework to analyse preferences in single profile discrete choice experiments. Application
Sandra Chyderiotis1, Jonathan Sicsic2, Nathalie Thilly3
1Unité de Recherche et d'Expertise Epidémiologie des maladies émergentes, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux - 75724 Paris cedex 15, France.
Background:
We previously conducted a single-profile discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences of adolescents around HPV vaccine communication, finding that only half of participants made variable choices (non-uniform respondents) from which preferences were elicited. In this paper we provide a framework to evaluate post-choice certainty information to elicit preferences even among respondents who uniformly accepted (serial demanders) or refused (serial non-demanders) hypothetical vaccination scenarios.
Methods:
During an in-class online questionnaire among 1458 French adolescents aged 13-15 years old, we collected certainty levels (0-10) after decisions on nine hypothetical scenarios, including four vaccination attributes: information on vaccine-preventable disease type, on vaccine safety, on potential for indirect protection and on vaccine coverage. We developed a vaccine eagerness scale (ranging from -10 to 10), by combining information on the binary decision (accept vs. refuse the hypothetical vaccine) and the decision certainty level. We used random effects linear regressions to evaluate attributes' impact on vaccine eagerness. Sensitivity analyses were performed taking into account low response quality, assessed as invariant certainty and low response time.
Results:
Attributes' impact on decision certainty were similar between serial demanders (N = 659) and non-uniform respondents (N = 711): mentioning a positive benefit-risk balance significantly decreased certainty to accept (coefficient -0.93), while information on 80% coverage in other countries (+0.33) and potential for disease elimination (+0.09) increased it. Among serial non-demanders, significant attribute impacts were observed only after exclusion of low-quality responses (N = 31): a potential for disease elimination (coefficient: +0.24) and 80% coverage in other countries (+0.42) significantly increased certainty of refusing vaccination. Combining decision and certainty into a vaccine eagerness indicator allowed analysing preferences in the full sample, including "hesitant" respondents, who were sensitive to the content of the vaccination profile.
Conclusion:
Choice certainty informs on respondents' preferences in single-profile discrete-choice experiments, in particular among those with uniform responses.
More Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12:14Exploring Life History Choices: Using Temperature and Substrate Type as Interacting Factors for Blowfly Larval and Female Preferences
Published on: November 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Framing Effects
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...