Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus
David E Kandzari1, Felix Mahfoud1,2, Michael A Weber3
1Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, GA (D.E.K.).
Insights
Device-based therapies offer new hypertension treatments. Standardizing clinical trial design and definitions is crucial for comparing results and advancing research on these innovative approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Hypertension Research
- Medical Device Development
Background:
- High prevalence of uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence necessitate novel hypertension treatments.
- Device-based therapies are expanding, requiring standardized clinical trial methodologies.
- Existing trial designs lack consistency, hindering comparability and data pooling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish consensus principles for clinical trial design and outcome definitions for device-based hypertension therapies.
- To address challenges in evaluating new technologies for hypertension treatment.
- To promote consistency in research for the world's leading cause of death and disability.
Main Methods:
- Integration of evolving evidence and expert consensus from the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC).
- Inclusion of regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology.
- Development of pragmatic consensus principles for study design and outcome definitions.
Main Results:
- Proposed standardized methods for blood pressure assessment.
- Recommendations for effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone.
- Guidelines for defining safety outcomes in clinical studies.
Conclusions:
- Standardization is paramount for trial comparability and data poolability in device-based hypertension research.
- The HARC document provides a framework for evaluating emerging hypertension technologies.
- Adoption of these principles will advance the development of effective treatments for hypertension.
Abstract:
The clinical implications of hypertension in addition to a high prevalence of both uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence promote interest in developing device-based approaches to hypertension treatment. The expansion of device-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials underscores the need for consistency in trial design, conduct, and definitions of clinical study elements to permit trial comparability and data poolability. Standardizing methods of blood pressure assessment, effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone, and safety outcomes are paramount. The Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC) document represents an integration of evolving evidence and consensus opinion among leading experts in cardiovascular medicine and hypertension research with regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology. The HARC document integrates the collective information among device-based therapies for hypertension to better address existing challenges and identify unmet needs for technologies proposed to treat the world's leading cause of death and disability. Consistent with the Academic Research Consortium charter, this document proposes pragmatic consensus clinical design principles and outcomes definitions for studies aimed at evaluating device-based hypertension therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension V: Nursing Management

