Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.2K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.2K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

6.8K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
6.8K
Restriction Enzymes01:11

Restriction Enzymes

32.1K
Restriction enzymes are bacterial enzymes used to cut DNA in a sequence-specific manner. To cleave DNA, they bind to specific palindromic sequences called restriction sites. Such palindromic DNA sequences or inverted repeats are commonly found in regions of functional significance, such as the origin of replication, gene operator sites, and regions containing transcription termination signals.
The host bacteria protect their own genomic DNA from these enzymes by methylating these sites. Some...
32.1K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.2K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.2K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

23.2K
One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
23.2K
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation02:53

Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation

6.2K
Because the DNA segments are cut and reorganized in a direction-specific manner, site-specific recombination has emerged as an efficient genetic engineering technique. Flippase and Cyclization recombinases or Flp and Cre, respectively, are two members of the tyrosine recombinase family derived from bacteriophages, that are used to mediate site-specific DNA insertions, deletions, and targeted expression of proteins in mammalian cell lines.
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
6.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gigabase-scale deletion scanning of the human genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Global genetic interaction network of a human cell maps conserved principles and informs functional interpretation of gene co-essentiality profiles.

Cell·2026
Same author

The modifiers that cause changes in gene essentiality.

Cell systems·2026
Same author

Integrating natural and engineered genetic variations to decode regulatory influence on blood traits.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Quantitative analysis of genetic interactions in human cells from genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Chromothripsis and ecDNA initiated by N4BP2 nuclease fragmentation of cytoplasm-exposed chromosomes.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same journal

Correction to 'New origin firing is inhibited by APC/CCdh1 activation in S-phase after severe replication stress'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

VeloRM: disentangling pre- and post-splicing RNA modification dynamics at single-cell resolution.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Accessibility of telomeric overhangs to stabilizing small-molecule ligands.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multivalent interactions mediate SNAIL transcription factor stimulation of the nucleosome deacetylase activity of the CoREST complex.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide mapping of DNA G-quadruplexes in Trypanosoma brucei chromatin reveals enrichment in coding regions and transcription start sites.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.3K

Predicting base editing outcomes using position-specific sequence determinants.

Ananth Pallaseni1, Elin Madli Peets1, Jonas Koeppel1

  • 1Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.

Nucleic Acids Research
|March 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

CRISPR base editors show sequence-biased DNA editing, influenced by flanking nucleotides. A new machine learning model predicts editing activity, improving planning for gene editing applications.

More Related Videos

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.6K
A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.3K
Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors
09:22

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

Published on: February 28, 2021

5.6K
A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • CRISPR/Cas base editors offer precise DNA sequence modification.
  • Understanding base editor activity determinants is crucial for effective gene editing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate sequence biases influencing CRISPR/Cas base editor activity.
  • To develop a predictive model for base editing efficiency and specificity.
  • To assess the impact of sequence context on therapeutic gene editing outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic measurement of base editing frequencies across thousands of target sequences in human cell lines.
  • Training a machine learning model using sequence features to predict editing activity.
  • Evaluating model performance and generalization capabilities compared to existing tools.

Main Results:

  • Base editing activity is significantly influenced by flanking nucleotides, affecting the editing window.
  • Position-specific sequence biases impact editing rates differently across the editing window.
  • The developed machine learning model achieved prediction accuracies of 0.49–0.72 and showed improved generalization.
  • Analysis of disease mutation correction guides revealed substantial unwanted editing events.

Conclusions:

  • CRISPR base editing exhibits predictable, position-specific sequence biases.
  • A novel machine learning model enhances the prediction of base editor activity.
  • This work facilitates more efficient and precise planning of gene editing strategies for research and therapy.