ANtiangiogenic Second-line Lung cancer Meta-Analysis on individual patient data in non-small cell lung cancer:

Jordi Remon1, Benjamin Lacas2, Roy Herbst3

  • 1Département d'Oncologie Médicale, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
|March 14, 2022
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Adding antiangiogenics (AA) to second-line chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves survival, but benefits are modest and concentrated in younger patients. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • First-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (CT) is standard for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • A need exists to evaluate antiangiogenics (AA) as second-line treatments (2LT) in advanced NSCLC.
  • This meta-analysis validates the efficacy of AA combined with 2LT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of antiangiogenics (AA) plus standard second-line therapy (2LT) compared to 2LT alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • To validate the efficacy of these combinations as 2LT in advanced NSCLC.

Main Methods:

  • Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing AA plus 2LT to 2LT alone.
  • Trials included had to end accrual before 2015.
  • Fixed-effect models were used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Main Results:

  • Antiangiogenics (AA) significantly prolonged OS (HR=0.93) and PFS (HR=0.80) compared to 2LT alone.
  • Absolute 1-year OS and PFS benefits for AA were +1.8% and +3.5%, respectively.
  • OS benefit was greater in younger patients (<50 years) and those starting AA within 9 months of first-line therapy. AA increased hypertension risk but not thromboembolic events.

Conclusions:

  • Adding antiangiogenics (AA) to second-line therapy (2LT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) significantly improves OS and PFS.
  • The clinical benefit of AA is limited and primarily observed in younger patients and those treated earlier after first-line therapy.
  • While AA improves survival outcomes, careful consideration of patient selection and potential side effects like hypertension is warranted.