Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

06:48
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
9.3K
A randomized crossover single-case series comparing blocked versus random treatment for anomia
Victoria A Diedrichs1, Jennifer P Lundine1, Deena Schwen Blackett1
1Department of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
|March 15, 2022
Summary
Blocked practice aids skill acquisition, while random practice aids retention. For anomia treatment, random practice may enhance long-term word retrieval gains, though acquisition was similar for both methods.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Motor learning research indicates blocked practice improves skill acquisition, whereas random practice enhances retention and transfer.
- Similar findings exist in verbal learning and memory literature, suggesting practice schedules impact learning outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the differential effects of blocked versus random practice schedules in the treatment of anomia.
- To determine which practice schedule, blocked or random, is more effective for improving word retrieval in individuals with anomia.
Main Methods:
- A single-site, randomized crossover design was employed with 10 participants diagnosed with anomia.
- Each participant underwent four treatment phases: two blocked and two random, involving cued picture-naming therapy.
- Treatment and maintenance effects were analyzed using Tau-U, calculating the proportion of correctly named probes.
Main Results:
- Nine out of ten participants showed treatment effects across all four practice phases.
- Acquisition of word retrieval skills was comparable between blocked and random practice conditions.
- Maintenance effects were more frequently observed after random practice (12 phases) compared to blocked practice (7 phases).
Conclusions:
- While both blocked and random practice facilitate anomia treatment, random practice may offer superior maintenance of word retrieval gains.
- For anomia therapy involving repeated item practice, random presentation schedules could be more beneficial for sustained improvement.
- Further research is warranted to confirm the long-term benefits of random practice in anomia rehabilitation.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
8.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.0K
Crossover Experiments
3.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.8K
Blinding
3.3K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.3K
Group Design
9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
McNemar's Test
465
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
465
Blind Procedures
12.3K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.3K

