Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
Published on: July 18, 2025
Co-ordinated multidisciplinary intervention to reduce time to successful extubation for children on mechanical
Bronagh Blackwood1, Kevin P Morris2, Joanne Jordan1
1Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Insights
A new ventilation liberation intervention in critically ill children significantly reduced time to extubation but increased unplanned extubations. Further research is needed to clarify clinical importance and sustainability.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Mechanical Ventilation
Background:
- Daily assessment for liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation can shorten ventilation duration.
- Effectiveness of such interventions in pediatric populations remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a ventilation liberation intervention's effect on critically ill children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (primary).
- To assess the intervention's impact on all pediatric intensive care unit patients (secondary).
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial involving 18 UK pediatric intensive care units.
- Intervention included coordinated multidisciplinary care, tailored sedation plans, and modified extubation readiness testing.
- 10,495 patient admissions were analyzed, comparing intervention to usual care.
Main Results:
- The intervention significantly reduced time to successful extubation by 6.1 hours in children with anticipated prolonged ventilation.
- Successful extubation rates increased, but unplanned extubations also rose significantly.
- Post-extubation non-invasive ventilation use increased; hospital length of stay was longer, with no significant difference in mortality or other harms.
Conclusions:
- The intervention achieved a statistically significant, though small, reduction in time to extubation.
- The clinical significance of this effect size is uncertain, and the intervention's components require further investigation.
- Future studies should examine intervention sustainability and effects in diverse pediatric populations.
Background:
Daily assessment of patient readiness for liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation can reduce the duration of ventilation. However, there is uncertainty about the effectiveness of this in a paediatric population.
Objectives:
To determine the effect of a ventilation liberation intervention in critically ill children who are anticipated to have a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (primary objective) and in all children (secondary objective).
Design:
A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomised trial with economic and process evaluations.
Setting:
Paediatric intensive care units in the UK.
Participants:
Invasively mechanically ventilated children (aged < 16 years).
Interventions:
The intervention incorporated co-ordinated multidisciplinary care, patient-relevant sedation plans linked to sedation assessment, assessment of ventilation parameters with a higher than usual trigger for undertaking an extubation readiness test and a spontaneous breathing trial on low levels of respiratory support to test extubation readiness. The comparator was usual care. Hospital sites were randomised sequentially to transition from control to intervention and were non-blinded.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome measure was the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation until the first successful extubation. The secondary outcome measures were successful extubation, unplanned extubation and reintubation, post-extubation use of non-invasive ventilation, tracheostomy, post-extubation stridor, adverse events, length of intensive care and hospital stay, mortality and cost per respiratory complication avoided at 28 days.
Results:
The trial included 10,495 patient admissions from 18 paediatric intensive care units from 5 February 2018 to 14 October 2019. In children with anticipated prolonged ventilation (n = 8843 admissions: control, n = 4155; intervention, n = 4688), the intervention resulted in a significantly shorter time to successful extubation [cluster and time-adjusted median difference -6.1 hours (interquartile range -8.2 to -5.3 hours); adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.20; p = 0.02] and a higher incidence of successful extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.03) and unplanned extubation (adjusted relative risk 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.51; p = 0.03), but not reintubation (adjusted relative risk 1.10, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.36; p = 0.38). In the intervention period, the use of post-extubation non-invasive ventilation was significantly higher (adjusted relative risk 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.49; p = 0.04), with no evidence of a difference in intensive care length of stay or other harms, but hospital length of stay was longer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.97; p = 0.01). Findings for all children were broadly similar. The control period was associated with lower, but not statistically significantly lower, total costs (cost difference, mean £929.05, 95% confidence interval -£516.54 to £2374.64) and significantly fewer respiratory complications avoided (mean difference -0.10, 95% confidence interval -0.16 to -0.03).
Limitations:
The unblinded intervention assignment may have resulted in performance or detection bias. It was not possible to determine which components were primarily responsible for the observed effect. Treatment effect in a more homogeneous group remains to be determined.
Conclusions:
The intervention resulted in a statistically significant small reduction in time to first successful extubation; thus, the clinical importance of the effect size is uncertain.
Future Work:
Future work should explore intervention sustainability and effects of the intervention in other paediatric populations.
Trial Registration:
This trial is registered as ISRCTN16998143.
Funding:
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Related Concept Videos
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Endotracheal Intubation II: Nursing Management
1. Nursing Care of Patients Before Intubation
Before the endotracheal intubation procedure, nurses play an essential role in ensuring the process goes smoothly. The nurses must be familiar with intubation...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

