Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Benchmarking Semiempirical QM Methods for Calculating the Dipole Moment of Organic Molecules
Ademola Soyemi1, Tibor Szilvási1
1Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, United States.
Abstract:
The dipole moment is a simple descriptor of the charge distribution and polarity and is important for understanding and predicting various molecular properties. Semiempirical (SE) methods offer a cost-effective way to calculate dipole moment that can be used in high-throughput screening applications although the accuracy of the methods is still in question. Therefore, we have evaluated AM1, GFN0-xTB, GFN1-xTB, GFN2-xTB, PM3, PM6, PM7, B97-3c, HF-3c, and PBEh-3c SE methods, which cover a variety of SE approximations, to directly assess the performance of SE methods in predicting molecular dipole moments and their directions using 7211 organic molecules contained in the QM7b database. We find that B97-3c and PBEh-3c perform best against coupled-cluster reference values yielding dipole moments with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.10 and 0.11 D, respectively, which is similar to the MAE of density functional theory (DFT) methods (∼0.1 D) reported earlier. Analysis of the atomic composition shows that all SE methods show good performance for hydrocarbons for which the spread of error was within 1 D of the reference data, while the worst performances are for sulfur-containing compounds for which only B97-3c and PBEh-3c show acceptable performance. We also evaluate the effect of SE optimized geometry, instead of the benchmark DFT geometry, that shows a dramatic drop in the performance of AM1 and PM3 for which the range of error tripled. Based on our overall findings, we highlight that there is an optimal compromise between accuracy and computational cost using GFN2-xTB (MAE: 0.25 D) that is 3 orders of magnitude faster than B97-3c and PBEh-3c. Thus, we recommend using GFN2-xTB for cost-efficient calculation of the dipole moment of organic molecules containing C, H, O, and N atoms, whereas, for sulfur-containing organic molecules, we suggest PBEh-3c.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
Molecular Shape and Polarity
Bond Polarity, Dipole Moment, and Percent Ionic Character
Electric Dipoles and Dipole Moment
Theoretically, studying electric dipoles leads to understanding why the resultant electric forces around us are weak. Since electric forces are strong, remnant net charges are rare. Hence, the interaction between dipoles helps us understand electrical interactions in...
IR Spectrum Peak Intensity: Dipole Moment
Molecular Orbital Theory II