Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
The optimal percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Meng-Jin Hu1, Jiang-Shan Tan1, Wen-Yang Jiang1
1State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Insights
For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, immediate or staged multivessel PCI reduces long-term MACE. Staged PCI appears superior to immediate PCI for reducing long-term all-cause death.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with multivessel coronary artery disease presents complex treatment challenges.
- Optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy remains a subject of investigation to improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal PCI strategy for patients diagnosed with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.
- To compare immediate multivessel PCI, staged multivessel PCI, and culprit-only PCI.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis combining data from 13 randomized trials (7627 patients) and 21 prospective observational studies (60311 patients).
- Random effect risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess outcomes.
- Analysis focused on major adverse cardiac events (MACE), myocardial infarction, revascularization, and all-cause death.
Main Results:
- Randomized trials indicated that immediate or staged multivessel PCI lowered long-term MACE compared to culprit-only PCI.
- Multivessel PCI strategies reduced risks of myocardial infarction and revascularization but showed no significant difference in all-cause death in randomized trials.
- Observational studies suggested staged multivessel PCI reduced long-term all-cause death, while immediate multivessel PCI increased short-term all-cause death.
Conclusions:
- Multivessel PCI, whether immediate or staged, is preferable for STEMI patients with multivessel disease based on long-term outcome improvements in randomized trials.
- Real-world data from observational studies suggest staged multivessel PCI may be superior to immediate multivessel PCI.
- Staged multivessel PCI is proposed as the optimal strategy for this patient population.
Objective:
To investigate the optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease.
Methods:
Trials that randomized patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease to immediate multivessel PCI, staged multivessel PCI, or culprit-only PCI and prospective observational studies that investigated all-cause death were included. Random effect risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Results:
A total of 13 randomized trials with 7627 patients and 21 prospective observational studies with 60311 patients were included. In the pairwise and network meta-analysis based on randomized trials, immediate or staged multivessel PCI was associated with a lower risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACE; RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74) than culprit-only PCI, which was mainly due to lower risks of myocardial infarction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.88) and revascularization (RR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.51), without any significant difference in all-cause death (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.69 to 1.04; I 2 = 0.0%). However, short-term outcomes were deficient in randomized trials. The results from real-world prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI reduced long-term all-cause death (RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.71; I 2 = 15.6%), whereas immediate multivessel PCI increased short-term all-cause death (RR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.22 to 2.05; I 2 = 43.8%) relative to culprit-only PCI.
Conclusion:
For patients in randomized trials, multivessel PCI in an immediate or staged procedure was preferred due to improvements in long-term outcomes. As a supplement, the results in real-world patients derived from prospective observational studies suggested that staged multivessel PCI was superior to immediate multivessel PCI. Therefore, staged multivessel PCI may be the optimal PCI strategy for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina IV: Management