Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
The Leadership Arena-Reputation-Identity (LARI) model: Distinguishing shared and unique perspectives in multisource
Jasmine Vergauwe1, Joeri Hofmans2, Bart Wille1
1Department of Developmental, Personality, and Social Psychology.
Multisource leadership ratings reveal unique insights from different perspectives. The Leadership Arena-Reputation-Identity (LARI) model, using bifactor modeling, confirms superiors offer the most distinct information on leader behavior.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Leadership Studies
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Multisource leadership ratings assume diverse rater groups (subordinates, peers, superiors) offer unique perspectives beyond self-evaluation.
- Current research often fails to quantify the overlap and uniqueness within these different rater perspectives.
- The Trait-Reputation-Identity (TRI) model provides a framework for understanding shared and distinct impressions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and validate the Leadership Arena-Reputation-Identity (LARI) model for analyzing multisource leadership ratings.
- To statistically decompose the variance in multisource ratings into shared and unique components.
- To determine the extent to which different rater groups contribute unique information about leadership behavior.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Leadership Arena-Reputation-Identity (LARI) model based on the TRI model.
- Utilized bifactor modeling to statistically differentiate leadership consensus (Arena), reputation, and self-identity.
- Tested the LARI model against five alternative models using two large multisource datasets with varying leadership instruments.
Main Results:
- The LARI bifactor model demonstrated superior fit compared to alternative models in both large-scale samples.
- Variance decomposition confirmed that each rater source (subordinates, peers, superiors) contributes unique information.
- Superiors consistently provided the largest proportion of unique information across all leadership dimensions in both samples.
Conclusions:
- The LARI model effectively disentangles shared and unique variance in multisource leadership ratings.
- Each rater group offers distinct insights, validating the utility of multisource feedback.
- Future research should leverage the LARI model to further explore the unique contributions of different rater perspectives in leadership assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Role-Based Identity
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Stereotype Content Model
Halo Effect

