Nepal measles outbreak response immunization during COVID-19: A risk-based intervention strategy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Fabrication of Pulsatile Polymeric Microparticles Encapsulating Rabies Antigen
Published on: May 12, 2023
Anindya Sekhar Bose1, Pasang Rai2, Binod Prasad Gupta3
1World Health Organization (WHO), Department of Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract:
In 2020, National Immunization Programme (NIP) of Nepal implemented a measles outbreak response immunization (ORI) campaign, which was additional to an ongoing preventive measles-rubella SIA campaign. Both campaigns were implemented during ongoing COVID-19 transmission. By April, 220 measles cases and two deaths were confirmed from eight districts of Nepal. The NIP triangulated information from surveillance (measles and COVID-19), measles immunization performance and immunity profile, programme capacities and community engagement and applied a logical decision-making framework to the collated data to inform 'Go/No-Go' decisions for ORI interventions. This was reviewed by the National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC) for endorsement. Outbreak response with non-selective immunization (ORI), vitamin-A administration and case management were implemented in affected municipalities of four districts, while in the remaining districts outbreak response without ORI were undertaken. The structure and iterative application of this logical framework has been described. ORI was implemented without interrupting the ongoing measles-rubella vaccination campaign which had targeted children from 9 to 59 months of age. The age group for ORI was same as SIA in one sub-district area, while for the other three sub-district areas it was from 6 months to 15 years of age. More than 32,000 persons (97% coverage) were vaccinated in ORI response. Overall measles incidence decreased by 98% after ORI. The daily incidence rate of measles was 94 times higher (95% confidence interval: 36.11 - 347.62) before the ORI compared to two weeks after ORI until year end. Close attention to surveillance and other data to inform actions and seamless collaboration between NIP and core immunization partners (WHO, UNICEF), with guidance from NIAC were key elements in successful implementation. This was an example of feasible application of the global framework for implementation of a mass vaccination campaign during COVID-19 through application of a simple decision-making logical framework.
Insights
Nepal
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Immunization Programs
Background:
- Measles outbreaks pose a significant public health threat, exacerbated by concurrent health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Nepal's National Immunization Programme (NIP) faced challenges in managing measles outbreaks amidst ongoing COVID-19 transmission in 2020.
- Timely and effective outbreak response is crucial to curb measles spread and prevent mortality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the decision-making framework used by Nepal's NIP for implementing measles outbreak response immunization (ORI) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the ORI campaign in controlling measles incidence.
- To highlight key factors contributing to the successful implementation of mass vaccination during a pandemic.
Main Methods:
- A logical decision-making framework was developed and applied, integrating data from measles and COVID-19 surveillance, immunization coverage, and program capacity.
- The framework informed 'Go/No-Go' decisions for ORI interventions, reviewed by the National Immunization Advisory Committee (NIAC).
- Outbreak response strategies, including ORI, vitamin A administration, and case management, were implemented in affected areas.
Main Results:
- Measles outbreak response immunization (ORI) was implemented in four districts, alongside ongoing measles-rubella supplemental immunization activities (SIA).
- Over 32,000 individuals were vaccinated during the ORI, achieving 97% coverage.
- Measles incidence decreased by 98% following the ORI, with a 94-fold reduction in daily incidence rate compared to the pre-intervention period.
Conclusions:
- The study demonstrates the feasible application of a simple, data-driven decision-making framework for implementing mass vaccination campaigns during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Close collaboration between the NIP, immunization partners (WHO, UNICEF), and guidance from NIAC were critical for successful ORI implementation.
- The findings underscore the importance of robust surveillance and adaptive strategies in controlling infectious disease outbreaks in complex public health environments.
More Related Videos
13:00Intranasal Immunization and Milk Collection in Studies of Maternal Immunization in New Zealand White Rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus
Published on: July 31, 2021
09:13Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
Published on: November 1, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....