Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Taking a closer look at mindful eating: incremental validity and importance of subfacets
Diana Peitz1, Petra Warschburger2
1Counseling Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. dpeitz@uni-potsdam.de.
Purpose:
Mindful eating (ME) seems a promising approach to clarify the underlying mechanisms of mindfulness-based interventions for eating and weight-related issues. The current study aimed to investigate the incremental validity of this eating-specific approach beyond a generic conception of mindfulness and explore preliminary indication which subfacets of the multidimensional construct ME might be of particular importance in order to study them more precisely and tailor mindfulness-based interventions for eating and weight-related issues more properly.
Methods:
Self-report data (N = 292) were collected online. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to explore the incremental validity of ME beyond generic mindfulness, predicting maladaptive eating (emotional and uncontrolled eating) and consumption of energy-dense food. Multiple regressions were used to examine the impact of the seven different ME subfacets on the very same outcomes.
Results:
Findings demonstrated the incremental validity of ME on all outcomes. Generic mindfulness no longer predicted emotional eating, uncontrolled eating, or the consumption of energy-dense food when entering ME. The subfacet 'non-reactive stance' predicted all three outcomes significantly. For emotional and uncontrolled eating, the subfacets 'accepting and non-attached attitude toward one's own eating experience', 'eating in response to awareness of fullness', and the 'awareness of eating triggers and motives' additionally showed a significant influence.
Conclusion:
ME seems a valuable approach in clarifying how mindfulness might impact eating and weight-related issues. Beyond that, it might be beneficial for upcoming interventions to strengthen specific ME subfacets, depending on the focused outcomes.
Level Of Evidence:
Level V, descriptive cross-sectional study.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Schemas
Self-Regulation
Introspection
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

