Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Study of Self-Interaction Errors in Density Functional Calculations of Magnetic Exchange Coupling Constants Using
Prakash Mishra1, Yoh Yamamoto2, Po-Hao Chang2
1Computational Science Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States.
Abstract:
We examine the role of self-interaction error (SIE) removal on the evaluation of magnetic exchange coupling constants. In particular, we analyze the effect of scaling down the self-interaction correction (SIC) for three nonempirical density functional approximations (DFAs) namely, the local spin density approximation, the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation, and the recent SCAN family of meta-GGA functionals. To this end, we employ three one-electron SIC methods: Perdew-Zunger SIC [Perdew, J. P.; Zunger, A. Phys. Rev. B, 1981, 23, 5048.], the orbitalwise scaled SIC method [Vydrov, O. A. et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 094108.], and the recent local scaling method [Zope, R. R. et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 214108.]. We compute the magnetic exchange coupling constants using the spin projection and nonprojection approaches for sets of molecules composed of dinuclear and polynuclear H···He models, organic radical molecules, and chlorocuprate and compare these results against accurate theories and experiment. Our results show that for the systems that mainly consist of single-electron regions, PZSIC performs well, but for more complex organic systems and the chlorocuprates, an overcorrecting tendency of PZSIC combined with the DFAs utilized in this work is more pronounced, and in such cases, LSIC with kinetic energy density ratio performs better than PZSIC. Analysis of the results in terms of SIC corrections to the density and to the total energy shows that both density and energy correction are required to obtain an improved prediction of magnetic exchange couplings.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Electric Dipoles and Dipole Moment
Theoretically, studying electric dipoles leads to understanding why the resultant electric forces around us are weak. Since electric forces are strong, remnant net charges are rare. Hence, the interaction between dipoles helps us understand electrical interactions in...

