Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
59
Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia
Yuan Wu1,2,3, Yue Huang1,2,3, Shu-Han Wang1,2,3
1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin 300384, China.
International Journal of Ophthalmology
|March 21, 2022
Summary
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy using smart pulse technology (SMART) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) both increase higher-order aberrations. Long-term visual quality after SMART PRK is slightly superior to FS-LASIK.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Refractive Surgery
- Corneal Surgery
Background:
- Myopia correction is a common ophthalmic procedure.
- Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (SMART) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) are advanced refractive surgery techniques.
- Objective visual quality assessment is crucial for evaluating surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare objective visual quality changes after SMART PRK versus FS-LASIK in low to moderate myopia.
- To evaluate the impact of these procedures on corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and optical quality metrics.
Main Methods:
- Corneal HOAs, coma, and spherical aberration were measured using Pentacam.
- Optical quality analysis system (OQAS-II) assessed modulation transfer function cutoff, objective scatter index (OSI), and Strehl ratio (SR).
- Measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, with data analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.
Main Results:
- Both groups showed increased HOAs postoperatively.
- Corneal vertical coma was higher in the FS-LASIK group compared to the SMART group.
- Objective scatter index (OSI) was elevated in both groups at 1 month, with slightly higher values in the FS-LASIK group at 3 and 6 months.
- Modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff differed significantly between groups at 6 months.
Conclusions:
- Both SMART PRK and FS-LASIK lead to increased HOAs and delayed visual quality recovery.
- Long-term objective visual quality appears slightly better with SMART PRK compared to FS-LASIK.
- Further research may elucidate long-term differences in visual outcomes between these techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
3.3K
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
3.3K
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
849
Angle-closure glaucoma, or closed-angle glaucoma, is an eye condition where the iris bulges out and blocks the iridocorneal angle, resulting in a buildup of aqueous humor and increased intraocular pressure. Immediate medical attention is necessary due to the sudden onset of symptoms. The treatment for angle-closure glaucoma includes short-term and long-term approaches. Short-term treatment involves using eye drops like pilocarpine to lower intraocular pressure by increasing aqueous humor...
849
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
720
In open-angle glaucoma, the iridocorneal angle remains open, but the trabecular meshwork becomes stiff, slowing down the outflow of aqueous humor. This causes a buildup of aqueous humor in the anterior chamber, leading to a sudden increase in intraocular pressure. The treatment for open-angle glaucoma focuses on reducing the elevated intraocular pressure by either decreasing the secretion of aqueous humor or increasing its outflow.
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
720

